How to Determine Cell Reaction and Ksp of CuBr?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the overall cell reaction and calculating the solubility product constant (Ksp) of CuBr at 298K, given the electrochemical cell setup. Participants are encouraged to simplify the reaction involving CuBr into its ionic components, specifically Cu+ and Br-. Additionally, the impact of increasing the pressure of H2 from 1 atm to 2 atm on the electromotive force (EMF) is questioned, with references to Le Chatelier's principle for understanding the effects of pressure changes on the equilibrium. Clarification on how to approach these calculations and the underlying principles is sought. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving the homework problem effectively.
lioric
Messages
335
Reaction score
26

Homework Statement



Pt l H2 (1atm) l HBr (1x10-4M) ll CuBr l Cu = 0.599 V at 298K

i) determine the overall cell reation and calculate the Ksp of CuBr at 298K
ii) What would be the effect on EMF if pressure of H2 increases from 1atm to 2atm. Why?


Homework Equations



CuBr = Cu+ x Br-

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to simplify this equation to ions
And can someone explain what the pressure change would do? Do i have to think about the La chatlear's principles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start writing two separate half cell reactions.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top