How to Determine Forces on Ropes in a Suspended L-Shaped Beam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Numeriprimi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam
AI Thread Summary
To determine the forces acting on the ropes of a suspended L-shaped beam, the key equations involve balancing the resultant force and moment. The total tension in the ropes must equal the gravitational force acting on the beam, and moments can be calculated about any point, ideally the point of attachment. The center of mass of the beam is crucial for accurately computing moments, as the weight acts at this point. In the second situation, while the same equations apply, the line of force changes, necessitating adjustments in calculations. Understanding the center of mass and applying the correct moment formulas will lead to the solution for the tensions in the ropes.
Numeriprimi
Messages
135
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Homogeneous beam shaped in letter L is suspended on two ropes of the same length l.
The beam is of negligible thickness and its longer arm is three times longer than the shorter arm. Its overall length is l as well as the length of one rope. Look at each situation in the figures. How can I determine the forces acting on the rope at points A and B in both situations?
There is picture on first example: http://fyzikalniolympiada.cz/archiv/55/fo55a1_z.pdf

2. The attempt at a solution
A)
So, I have some equalities...
1) the resultant force is zero
T_1+T_2-F_G = 0
T_1+T_2 = F_G = mg
2) the resultant moment is zero
M_1 + M_2 = 0
... where is the axis of rotation? in C?
and if the axis of rotation in C, where is the arm of forces? (the d from equation M=Fd)
... it is a perpendicular line from C to lengthened shape?
What is different in the second situation? apply the same equation?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Numeriprimi said:
So, I have some equalities...
1) the resultant force is zero
T_1+T_2-F_G = 0
T_1+T_2 = F_G = mg
2) the resultant moment is zero
M_1 + M_2 = 0

Good, so far.

... where is the axis of rotation? in C?

There is no rotation. Any point can be used to compute moments. But because your equation has only the moments of the tension in the ropes, that point must be C (otherwise, you would have the moment of weight).

and if the axis of rotation in C, where is the arm of forces? (the d from equation M=Fd)
... it is a perpendicular line from C to lengthened shape?

It is the distance between the line of force and the line parallel to the force passing through C.

What is different in the second situation? apply the same equation?

Same equation, but note that the line of force is different.
 
Ok, thanks.
AC = 2/3 l; BC = 1/3 l
(AB)^2 = (AC)^2 - (BC)^2 = (2/3 l)^2 - (1/3 l)^2 = 3/9 l^2
AB = √(3/9 l^2) = √3 /3 * l = 1/√3 * l

I'll add a point on pictures
X ... point making right triangle XBC
I can make two equations by Pytgagoras equation.
1) (AB - XC)^2 = AC^2 - AX^2
(1/√3 * l - XC)^2 = (2/3 * l)^2 - AX^2
2) XC^2 = BC^2 - AX^2
XC^2 = (1/3 * l)^2 - AX^2

I have two unknows in the equations... So, I can solve it.
I have to know XC anc AB-XC fordetermining moments.
Than M= T_1*(AB-XC) - T_2*XC
And then I will have some system of equations for determinate T_1 and T_2.
It is true?

However, what with B? Same solution, but no AB-XC an XC, but different progress? So, XC an YC.
 
I misdirected you in my previous post. I said that if you choose C as the point about which the moments of force are computed, then the moment of weight will be zero. That is not correct.

I think it will be better to find the location of the center of mass in both cases then compute moments about this center. Are you familiar with the formula for the moment of force that uses the sine function?
 
Why it isn't correct?
Hmm, no, I know only basic formulas :-(
 
There are three forces: two in the ropes and the weight of the beam.

The weight of the beam acts as if it was applied to the center of mass of the beam. To compute its moment properly, you have to know its center of mass.
 
This is a repost of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=730319.
Numeriprimi, why didn't you respond to me on that thread? There, I suggested you take moments about one of the points of attachment. For the moment of the beam, you could first find its centre of mass as Voko suggests, but I think you might as well just treat the two arms as separate loads. E.g. consider the section AC. What is its mass? Where is its mass centre? What moment does it have about A?
 
Back
Top