SupaVillain said:
seems on "Vout" that it is at 30khz and by 10uh + 10uh, a 20uh to 4000uh ratio is equal to a 200:1 ratio for the inductance, and the square root of 200 is about 14, so a 14:1 ratio for the turns, with the turns at 5+5=10 turns for the primary, the secondary coil should be 10*14=140 turns.
You lost me there in your first leap of beginners reasoning. But I did warn you with …
Baluncore said:
Modelling transformers can be tricky. Inductance is proportional to the square of the turns count.
The resonant frequency of the converter comes from the capacitance C1, in parallel with the primary winding inductance L2 & L3 combined. But L2 and L3 are wound on the same core, each with the same turns count, with coupling, Kt = 100%.
So the combination is not 10uH + 10 uH = 20 uH.
If L = 10 uH for n turns, then for 2n turns, L = 40 uH.
It got you there when you forgot to apply the square of 2 = 4, because they are combined into the same inductor with a centre tap.
The converter resonance will therefore be at frequency = 1 / ( 2 * Pi * Sqrt( 40uH * 0u68F ) ) = 30.51657 kHz
Which is very close to what the model gives you.
Next we consider output voltage. The converter operates by alternatively grounding each end of the primary. So for my previous attached diagram, the square wave voltage across the whole primary is therefore twice supply voltage, 2 * 30V = 60V. L1 provides some isolation from the supply so the sine wave ringing has an amplitude of about Sqrt(2) of that. 60V * 1.4142 = 84.85V.
The secondary to primary inductance ratio is 4000 uH / 40 uH = 100.
The turns ratio will therefore be only Sqrt(100) = 10.
The secondary voltage will therefore be 10 * 84.85V = 848.5V. Once it settles, the model gives us close to 93.5V for the primary and 935V for the secondary. I believe the difference is due to the effects of L1 inductance and it's internal Rs on the conversion from square to sinewave.
The kt value of 100% for the transformer is also probably closer to 99%.