How to Determine Scalar Potential Inside and Outside a Charged Sphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the scalar potential inside and outside a charged sphere using Poisson's and Laplace's equations. Participants explore the implications of spherical symmetry, noting that the potential inside the sphere does not depend on the radial distance due to the uniform charge density. For the inside, the potential is derived as V = -ρ₀r²/6ε₀, while outside, Laplace's equation leads to V = -a/r + c, where 'a' is a constant. The conversation also highlights the importance of boundary conditions and the need for two constants of integration in the second-order differential equation. Overall, the thread emphasizes the mathematical approach to solving the problem while addressing common misconceptions.
dsta
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use Poisson's equation and Laplace's equation to determine the scalar potential inside and outside a sphere of constant charge density po. Use Coulomb's law to give the limit at very large r, and an argument from symmetry to give the value of E at r=0.


Homework Equations


del2V = - p/epsilono
del2V = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure how to start this just using Poisson's/Laplace's equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is \nabla^2V in spherical coordinates?...Are there any symmetries that allow you to simplify it?
 
Hmm okay. I'm not sure what symmetries you would need to consider to simplify \nabla^2V in spherical coordinates. Because the charge density is constant, V does not depend on r inside the sphere...I'm not sure about anything else.
 
What makes you think V doesn't depend on r?:confused:

Surely you can say that it doesn't depend on either the azimuthal or polar angles though right?...After all, a test charged placed at any given value of r, will "see" the same charge distribution at say \theta=\phi=\pi/4 as it would at say \theta=3\pi, \phi=\pi/7 or any other angle wouldn't it? (Draw a picture to convince yourself of this!)...This type of symmetry is called spherical symmetry.
 
Oops sorry, I meant to say that. Okay so using the simplified form of the equation for \nabla^2V in spherical coordinates, and Poisson's equation, I was able to get the equation for V inside the sphere. For outside the sphere, the charge density is 0 obviously, so you have to use Laplace's equation. I tried to do this but I can't anywhere near the form of the equation I'm meant to be getting :frown:
 
How about you show me your steps (for both inside and outside) and I'll see if I can spot where you are going wrong...
 
Inside the sphere:
\nabla^2V = \frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(r^2\frac{dV}{dr}) = \frac{\rho_{o}}{\epsilon_{o}}
\Rightarrow V = - \frac{\rho_{o} r^2}{6\epsilon_{o}}

Outside the sphere:
\nabla^2V = \frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(r^2\frac{dV}{dr}) = 0
\Rightarrow r^2\frac{dV}{dr} = constant = a
\Rightarrow V = \frac{-a}{r} + c
I'm assuming that you now have to use some sort of boundary conditions...
 
Last edited:
dsta said:
Inside the sphere:
\nabla^2V = \frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(r^2\frac{dV}{dr}) = \frac{\rho_{o}}{\epsilon_{o}}
\Rightarrow V = - \frac{\rho_{o} r^2}{6\epsilon_{o}}

You're missing a minus sign in your first equation (although it looks like that's just a typo, since your answer has the correct sign)...More importantly, shouldn't you have two constants of integration for the solution to this 2nd order ODE?:wink:
 
Back
Top