How to Determine Values for a and b in a 3x4 System for Infinite Solutions?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a system of three equations in three variables (x, y, z) and focuses on determining specific values for parameters a and b that would result in the system having infinite solutions. The original poster presents a method for finding these values based on manipulating the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to explain their method of finding a and b by manipulating the equations, expressing concern about the clarity and rigor of their explanation. Other participants discuss alternative approaches, including solving the system directly and analyzing conditions for infinite solutions.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided supportive feedback on the original poster's method, with some suggesting that it is valid and clever. There is an acknowledgment of different approaches to the problem, but no consensus has been reached on a single preferred method.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need for clarity in explaining the reasoning behind the chosen method, as well as a recognition of the balance between creative problem-solving and more systematic approaches. The discussion reflects a learning environment where participants are encouraged to explore various techniques.

Ewan_C
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
[Solved] 3x4 system of equations

Homework Statement



Consider the following system of three equations in x, y and z.

2x + 4y + 5z = 17
4x + ay + 3z = b
8x + 7y + 13z = 40

Give values for a and b in the second equation that make this system consistent, but with an infinite set of solutions.

The Attempt at a Solution



I found the answers a= -1, b=6 easily enough. I was told by my teacher that if a system of three equations has infinite solutions, one of the equations can be found from the other two. I multiplied equation 1 by 2 and subtracted the result from equation 3. This gave:

4x - y + 3z = 6

and so finding the values of a and b was pretty simple from there. Plugging the numbers into a calculator gave an infinite number of solutions.

My question is, how can I better explain how to get a and b from the provided data? My method just seems like an educated guess rather than solid evidence - I don't think it'd look very good to an examiner. Cheers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is perfectly good. What you have shown is that a combination of the first and third equation give the middle equation if a= -1 and b= 6. It was clever of you to notice that "twice the first equation subtracted from the first" gives an equation that can be made exactly the same as the second if a and b have those values. I see no "guessing" there.

What I might have done (perhaps because I am not as smart as you!) would be to try to solve the system of equations and see what might prevent me from getting a single solution. If I subtract twice the first equation from the second, the "x"s cancel and I am left with (a- 8)y- 7z= b- 34. If I subtract 4 times the first equation from the third, again the "x"s cancel and I am left with -9y- 7z= 28. Now I can eliminate the z by subtracting that last equation from the previous one: [(a-8)+ 9]y= (a+1)y= b- 6. If a+1 is not 0, I can divide by it and get a single answer. In order that there not be a single answer, we must have a+ 1= 0 or a= -1. Of course, that would make the equation 0= b- 6. In order that that be true (for any y) we must have b= 6.

Frankly, I prefer your method.
 
Ewan, welcome to PhysicsForums. Halls: Nice humble response. I'm of Halls' mind here. I too tend to use a sledge hammer to force the solution to fall out where a little poking around would make the solution fall out with little effort. One of the PF 2007 guru award winners, Dick, is very good at poking around and making the solution fall out with little effort. (He also knows how to wield sledge hammers when needed.) Honing your skills with the heavy-handed techniques is important, but so is honing your skills at seeing a quick and easy way to solve the problem. There's nothing wrong with a bit of creativity.
 
Thanks for the responses. I guess I'll stick with my method in the OP then.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K