I How to ensure an equation is dimensionless when it includes "Debye"

Click For Summary
To determine if an expression is dimensionless, it is essential to analyze the units involved, particularly when dealing with the Debye term. The Debye unit, related to the electric dipole moment, can be expressed in terms of cgs units, where 1 Debye equals 1 Franklin times cm. By breaking down the units, the expression (Debye^2)(s^2)/(cm^5)(g) simplifies to a dimensionless form, confirming correctness. The calculation shows that the units cancel out to yield a value of 1, indicating the expression is indeed dimensionless. Understanding these unit conversions is crucial for verifying dimensional analysis in equations.
bumblebee77
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Can anyone please help me figure out how to break down "Debye" into base units so that I can check if an expression is dimensionless in the CGS system?
I am trying to check if an expression is dimensionless. If it is, then I have done things correctly. However, I am stuck on how to deal with a (Debye^2) term. How can I break it down to find out if it cancels out with the other units I have left? I know this is probably a trivial question, but just cannot figure it out.

I have this ("^2" means "squared"):

(Debye^2) (s^2) / (cm^5) g
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An expression is of course dimensionless in any system of units. It's the cgs-unit for the electric dipole moment having the dimension Franklin times cm. Now ##1 \text{Fr} =1 \text{statC}=1 \sqrt{\text{g} \; \text{cm}^3/\text{s}^2}##. So ##\text{Debye}^2 \text{s}^2/(\text{cm}^5 \text{g})=1 \text{g} \; \text{cm}^5/(\text{cm}^5 \; \text{g})=1## 👍
 
  • Love
Likes bumblebee77
vanhees71 said:
An expression is of course dimensionless in any system of units. It's the cgs-unit for the electric dipole moment having the dimension Franklin times cm. Now ##1 \text{Fr} =1 \text{statC}=1 \sqrt{\text{g} \; \text{cm}^3/\text{s}^2}##. So ##\text{Debye}^2 \text{s}^2/(\text{cm}^5 \text{g})=1 \text{g} \; \text{cm}^5/(\text{cm}^5 \; \text{g})=1## 👍
@vanhees71, thank you so much. I just could not get my head around this. Really appreciate it. I voted you up and if there's any other way I can give you credit, just let me know.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
922
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K