How to factor 6w^2 - 5wt - 4t^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeion
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The expression 6w^2 - 5wt - 4t^2 factors to (3w - 4t)(2w + t). The discussion highlights the challenge of splitting the middle term, with the user noting the importance of using opposite signs and the relationship between coefficients. The ac method is suggested for quadratics with a leading coefficient not equal to one, involving multiplying a and c, then finding factors that sum to b. It is also mentioned that not all quadratics can be factored into rational numbers, necessitating the use of the quadratic formula for some cases. Understanding these methods can aid in effectively factoring similar expressions.
zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Factor 6w^2 - 5wt - 4t^2

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



= 6w^2 + 3wt - 8wt - 4t^2
= 3w(2w + t) - 4t(2w + t)
= (3w - 4t)(2w + t)

I was able to figure out what to use for splitting up the -5wt after a lot of trial and errors, but I was just wondering if there was a general rule for finding out what to use to factor things in this form?

I noticed that I needed them to be opposite signs and is half of the coefficient of the first term and twice of the last.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For quadratics where the leading coefficient isn't 1, you'll often use the ac method where you multiply a and c, then find the factors of the result that add up to b. Notice that you split up the middle coefficient -5 into 3 and -8, which are two factors of 24, or the product of 6 and -4.

If that didn't make sense, just take a look on Google or read up on it http://people.richland.edu/james/misc/acmeth.html" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is there a proof for this method?
 
If you're given some quadratic ax2+bx+c it can be proven that it can't always be factorized into the form a(x-\alpha)(x-\beta) where \alpha and \beta are rational numbers, which is why factorizing can only be done through trial and error, because if they are either irrational or complex then the usual factorizing process won't work and you need to use the quadratic formula.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Back
Top