How to find a critical value of a distribution ?

szandara
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find an ANALYTICAL way to extract a critical value from a generic distribution. I need a way to find it analytically because I am trying to find a relationship between the critical values.

I always find methods that depends on the distribution tables, but I would like to know how these tables are built.

I did not find anything on the internet?

any advice? ( in particular I am working with Gaussian and ChiSquare distributions)

thanks

Simone
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Computing critical values for a statistical test from distributions involves solving equations such as \int_c^\infty f(x) dx = 0.05 for the value c. If there is no "analytical" solution for writing the integral then there is no "analytical" way to compute the critical value. I am assuming that by "analytical", you mean a relatively simple "closed form" formula. Is that what you mean? I know of no "analytical" way to solve the intergrals involved in the normal and chi-squared distributions. The tables are built by using numerical approximations to solve the equations.
 
Last edited:
yes that was actually what I wanted to know.

So, I must suppose that there's no closed form for Gaussian and Chi Square distributions?
I haven't tried myself yet.

S
 
szandara said:
yes that was actually what I wanted to know.

So, I must suppose that there's no closed form for Gaussian and Chi Square distributions?
I haven't tried myself yet.

S

For those problems, that is equivalent to solving the anti-derivative of those functions, which so far as Stephen Tashi has said, has not been found (yet).

If you find it, be sure to let us know!
 
chiro said:
For those problems, that is equivalent to solving the anti-derivative of those functions, which so far as Stephen Tashi has said, has not been found (yet).

If you find it, be sure to let us know!

I believe they have been proven not to exist using only a finite expression of standard functions.

However, just like sin(x) is just a conventional name for a function, we also have \Phi(x) which represents the anti-derivative of the standard normal distribution function.
 
I like Serena said:
I believe they have been proven not to exist using only a finite expression of standard functions.

However, just like sin(x) is just a conventional name for a function, we also have \Phi(x) which represents the anti-derivative of the standard normal distribution function.

Yeah I said the wrong thing, thanks for pointing that out.

I meant to say an analytic way of solving for c, which for many cases (even polynomials with degree higher than say 4 or 5) present a challenge.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top