How to find equilibrium pressure when volume changes

AI Thread Summary
When the volume of an equilibrium mixture containing N2O4 and NO2 is doubled at constant temperature, the initial pressures are halved, leading to a decrease in pressure. According to Le Chatelier's principle, the equilibrium shifts toward the side with more moles of gas, favoring the production of NO2. The equilibrium constant remains unchanged, indicating that temperature is the primary factor affecting equilibrium pressures. To calculate the new equilibrium pressures, an ICE table is used, leading to the determination of changes in partial pressures. The final equilibrium pressures are found to be P(N2O4) = 0.04 atm and P(NO2) = 0.46 atm.
dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
question: an equilibrium mixture contains N2O4 (P=0.27 atm) and NO2 (P=1.2 atm) at 350K. the volume is doubled at constant temperature. calculate the equilibrium pressure of both at new equilibrium.

what i know: when you double volume, pressure is halved and le chatliers principle says the equation will shift to the side with more moles of gas:

N2O4 <--> 2NO2

which in this case will shift to the right.

and i also know you cannot simply just half the pressures of each.

how do i start the rest of this problem? is it an ICE problem? any help to get started would be appreciated. thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dnt said:
question: an equilibrium mixture contains N2O4 (P=0.27 atm) and NO2 (P=1.2 atm) at 350K. the volume is doubled at constant temperature. calculate the equilibrium pressure of both at new equilibrium.
what i know: when you double volume, pressure is halved and le chatliers principle says the equation will shift to the side with more moles of gas:
N2O4 <--> 2NO2
which in this case will shift to the right.
and i also know you cannot simply just half the pressures of each.
how do i start the rest of this problem? is it an ICE problem? any help to get started would be appreciated. thanks.
That's right, when the volume doubles, the pressure decreases. and the nb of particles increases too. But after a short time, the system is back to equilibrium according to Le Chatliers principle. It means that the equilibrium constant (K) remains unchanged.
Remember that the equilibrium constant is only dependent of the temperature (T), according

\ln(\frac{K_2}{K_1})=-\frac{\Delta H}{R}({1\over T_2}\,-\,{1\over T_1})

\Delta H:\,\,\,is \,\,entalpy
 
still a little confused. does this mean the partial pressure does not change as volume changes? i don't understand why the number pf particles increases too - where do these extra particles come from?

and therefore, if volume and pressure changes do not change equilibrium partial pressures (if i am reading that correctly) what does? is temperature the only thing?
 
dnt said:
still a little confused. does this mean the partial pressure does not change as volume changes? i don't understand why the number pf particles increases too - where do these extra particles come from?
and therefore, if volume and pressure changes do not change equilibrium partial pressures (if i am reading that correctly) what does? is temperature the only thing?
OK, I will try to explain. Despite english is not my language. Of course if volume (V) increases, the nb of particles (N) increases according pV = nRT and you know that n = N/NA, and pressure will diminish. But it's easy to calculate the new equilibrium pressure with this method, Given the reaction:

N_2O_4 \leftrightharpoons 2NO_2

P(start): P(N_2O_4)=0,27 \,\, and \,\, P(NO_2)=1,2

\Delta P(N_2O_4)=-x\,\,and\,\,\Delta P(NO_2)=2x

\Delta P_{eq}(N_2O_4)=0,27-x\,\,and\,\,\Delta P_{eq}(NO_2)=2x

K=5,33=\frac{(P(NO_2))^2}{P(N_2O_4}=\frac{(2x)^2}{0,27-x}

solve this eqation, and we get x = 0,23
that is

P(N_2O_4)=0,04\,atm
and
P(NO_2)=0,46\,atm
 
where did you get K = 5.33? and is that Kp or Kc? and why isn't Peq for NO2 = 1.2 + 2x? where did the 1.2 go?

thanks for all your help.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top