How to find error between non-linear plot and data points?

AI Thread Summary
To measure the error between non-linear plots and data points, formal methods such as least-squares regression can be employed. The choice of regression technique depends on the specific characteristics of the curve and the desired outcomes. Various regression methods exist, each suited for different types of non-linear relationships. Understanding how to regress to a linear model is a foundational step before tackling non-linear regression. Accurate error measurement is crucial for effective data analysis and model fitting.
cantRemember
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Is there a formal way to measure the error between some arbitrary points and a non-linear curve in order to minimize it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The short answer is "yes".
You can regress to a curve in many ways... least-squares is popular.
What's best depends on the curve and what you want to know.
I'm guessing you already know how to regress to a line?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top