How to find mass with gravitational attraction.

AI Thread Summary
To find the individual masses of two objects attracted gravitationally, start with the gravitational force equation Fg = G m1m2/r^2. Given the total mass of 4.0 kg and the gravitational force of 2.5e-10 N at a distance of 0.25 meters, calculate m1m2 using m1m2 = (Fg * r^2) / G. This results in m1m2 = 0.23426. Use the system of equations m1 + m2 = 4 and m1m2 = 0.23426, substituting one equation into the other to solve for the individual masses. The process involves isolating one variable and substituting it into the second equation to find the solution.
ssjdbz101
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm trying to solve a problem, but I'm doing something wrong.

This is the problem out of my Physics book, but the problem I'm working on has different numbers, so any help will not be cheating, I just need to know the process.

Problem:
Two objects are attracted to each other gravitationally with a force of 2.5e-10 N when they are 0.25 meters apart. Their total mass is 4.0 kg. Find their individual masses.

Answer:
I know the answer is m1=3.9kg, and m2=0.1kg. But I don't know how they got this answer.

Help please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can calculate the product of the masses with the given force and distance. Then because you know the sum, you have a system of 2 equations with 2 unknowns
 
I know that, but I'm still confused.

Since the equation is: Fg = G m1m2/r^2

if I plug in the numbers I'm given:
Fg=2.5e-10
G=6.67e-11
r=0.25

I have: 2.5e-10 = 6.67e-11 m1m2 / 0.25^2.

I solve for m1m2, which is: m1m2 = (Fg*r^2)/G , right?

Doing that, I have m1m2 = (2.5e-10*0.0625)/6.67e-11 = 0.23426

Now what do I do?
I know m1=3.9, and m2=0.1, so shouldn't (m1m2=0.39) ?

The sum of the masses: (m1+m2=4), but how do I use this in the (m1m2=0.39) ?

I'm doing something wrong, but what?
 
I don't see anything wrong in your calculations but are you sure you copied the numbers right?

If you have two equations: m1 + m2 = 4 and m1*m2 = #

Solve for m1 in one equation like m1 = 4 - m2
And then plug that into the other equation m1*m2 = (4 - m2)*m2 = #
Once you have m2, go back to m1 + m2 = 4 to solve for m1.

The idea is to solve one equation for a variable. Then replace the same variable in the second equation so there's only one unknown.
 
Thanks, I figured it was that, but for some reason, I could not figure out (4-m2)*m2=#.
Major brain fart.

Thanks a lot!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top