How to Find Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics?

Biest
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a quick homework problem because I am confused. So a wave function with l = 1 in the state:

|\psi&gt; = \frac{1}{\sqrt{14}} \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 \\<br /> 2 \\<br /> 3i \end{array} \right)\]

and i have to find the probability to be in state \hbar, -\hbar, 0 in L_z, so i applied L_z so |\psi&gt; and got

L_z|\psi&gt; = \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{14}} \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 \\<br /> 0 \\<br /> -3i \end{array} \right)\]

How do i find the probabilities from that?Thanks,

Biest
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Always, the probability of finding a state |\psi\rangle in a state |\phi\rangle is \left| \left&lt;\phi \middle| \psi \right&gt;\right|^2.
 
But how do i take the \hbar, -\hbar 0 condition into account?
 
assuming your |\psi\rangle is in the basis of normalised angular momentum eigenstates, then your probabilities just correspond to \frac{1}{14} for \hbar, \frac{2}{7} for 0 and \frac{9}{14} for -\hbar.

so what happens is that for |\phi\rangle to return you an eigenvalue of say \hbar, we need

|\phi\rangle = \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \]

and taking \left| \left&lt;\phi \middle| \psi \right&gt;\right|^2, we get \frac{1}{14}.

hope it helps. QM was never my strong point. haha
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top