How to Find the Bloch Vector for a Density Matrix Using Taylor Expansion?

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I need to find the bloch vector for the density matrix \frac{1}{N}\exp{-\frac{H}{-k_bT}} where the Hamiltonian is given by H=\hbar\omega\sigma_z.


The Attempt at a Solution



I can break the Taylor series of exp into odd and even terms because sigma z squared is the identity. I get something that looks like sine and cosine but I'm missing i for Euler's equation. How else can I group the terms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cscott said:

Homework Statement



I need to find the bloch vector for the density matrix \frac{1}{N}\exp{-\frac{H}{-k_bT}} where the Hamiltonian is given by H=\hbar\omega\sigma_z.


The Attempt at a Solution



I can break the Taylor series of exp into odd and even terms because sigma z squared is the identity. I get something that looks like sine and cosine but I'm missing i for Euler's equation. How else can I group the terms?

I am not going to be very helpful because I know little about Bloch vectors but why do you need to get an i factor? I don't see anything else to do here than to simply expand and get the sine and cos terms.
 
Mmm I think you're right and now I feel stupid :P

Thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top