How to find the center of a paraboloidal wave

  • Thread starter Thread starter semc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Center Wave
semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Show that the paraboloidal wave centered at the point z1 is converted by a lens of focal length f into a paraboloidal wave centered about z2 where 1/z1+1/z2 =1/f


Homework Equations


Equation of paraboloidal wave and transmittance through a thin lens.


The Attempt at a Solution


I multiplied the paraboloidal wave and the transmittance through the thin lens and I got
U(r)=Aexp(-jnkd)exp[jk(\frac{x^2+y^2}{2f}-z)]
But how do I continue to show that this paraboloidal wave is centered at f?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like your lens is located at z=0; the parabolic wave centered at z is basically a spherical wave centered at z1 where z1 is faraway from the lens, i.e., z1^2>>x^2+y^2, so that the wavefront at the lens ~ exp[ik(x^2+y^2)/(2z1)]. (Taylor expansion of the phase ikR where R^2=x^2+y^2+z^2) Now multiply by the lens phase exp[ik(x^2+y^2)/(2f)] and figure out where the center is. Double check the sign conventions since I haven't done these for years.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top