How to find the electric field coming from a sphere WITHOUT using Gauss' law?

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field above the center of a charged spherical shell without using Gauss' law, one must integrate over the surface of the sphere, focusing on the z-component due to symmetry. The charge element is represented as dq = σdA, where dA points radially from the sphere. A coordinate system is essential for expressing the radial component of the electric field based on the distance to the charge. Utilizing symmetry can simplify the integration process from two dimensions to one. The shell theorem suggests that if the charge is symmetrically distributed, it can be treated as a point charge outside the sphere.
anban
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How do I find the electric field at a point above the center of a charged sphere? Assume the sphere is a shell.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

\

I know there will only be a z component to the electric field, because x and y components will cancel by symmetry. I think the process will have to involve integrating over the surface of the sphere. Where do I start?

More things I know (or think I know):
dq = σdA
The dA terms will point radially from the sphere.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the process will have to involve integrating over the surface of the sphere. Where do I start?
With a coordinate system, and with an expression for the radial component of the electric field as function of the distance to your charge.
You can use symmetry to reduce the two-dimensional integral to a one-dimensional integral quickly.
 
Can you use shell theorem to just treat it as a point charge, as long as the charge is symmetrically distributed?
 
That would be the result of Gauß' law ;).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top