How to find the input output relation of an unknown non-linear system?

AI Thread Summary
To identify the input-output relation of a non-linear system using MATLAB's neural network toolbox, set up a neural network with 10 inputs and 6 outputs, experimenting with the number of layers and nodes for optimal results. Split the 1,000 samples into a training set (approximately 800 samples) and a verification set (about 200 samples) for effective training and testing. While a neural network can predict outputs from inputs, it does not provide a mathematical expression for the relationship, making it a "black box" solution. If the system has no memory properties, the training process is simplified, focusing solely on the current input vector. Alternative methods for deriving an explicit input-output relation beyond neural networks were also requested.
dexterdev
Messages
194
Reaction score
1
Hi friends,
I have a system (with unknown properties) which takes an input vector of length 10 and outputs a vector with length 6.

I select Inputs vector 'I' which is a 1000x10 matrix, : 1000 samples of 10 elements. And outputs vector 'O' is a 1000x6 matrix,: 1000 samples of 6 elements.

I just want to find input output relation ie system identification.
How can I do this using neural network toolbox in matlab?

-Devanand T
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can try. Depending on what your end goal is a NN may or may not help. In general what you would do is setup a NN with 10 inputs and 6 outputs. The number of intermediate layers and nodes in those layers you would have to play with to find what gives you good results. You would then divide your 1,000 samples into a training and verification set (probably something like 800/200 split) and proceed training/testing it to see if you can find a relation.

The problems you might have:

1.) If in the end you want to be able to write down some mathematical expression for the relation you aren't going to get that from the NN. What you will end up with if it works is a NN that can predict the output from inputs but how it is doing that will be "magic".

2.) If the samples are memory dependent training it will be much more difficult. Does the output vector depend only on the current input vector or do the last X input vectors also have some influence on the output? If the system does have memory you can account for this by also giving the NN the last X input vectors or some of the previous output vectors but the whole thing starts to get more convoluted.
 
Floid said:
The problems you might have:

1.) If in the end you want to be able to write down some mathematical expression for the relation you aren't going to get that from the NN. What you will end up with if it works is a NN that can predict the output from inputs but how it is doing that will be "magic".

2.) If the samples are memory dependent training it will be much more difficult. Does the output vector depend only on the current input vector or do the last X input vectors also have some influence on the output? If the system does have memory you can account for this by also giving the NN the last X input vectors or some of the previous output vectors but the whole thing starts to get more convoluted.

Thanks for the reply first of all... Regarding problem 1) ie an output input relation equation, other than NN can you suggest some method...
And also present output depends only on present input...no memory property for the system.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top