How to Find the Numbers M and N in This AS Math Example?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ASMATHSHELPME
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Thanks
ASMATHSHELPME
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Find the numbers M and N such that:

5+4x -x^2 = m - (x - n)^2
for all real values of x.

If someone could work this out, Then ill show my workings and ask questions (its to do with the arrangements of N^2 after expanding brackets mainly.

Thanks in advanced,
ASMATHSHELPME
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to complete the square?

ax² + bx + c
= a[x² + (b/a)x] + c
= a[x² + (b/a)x + (b/2a)² - (b/2a)²] + c
= a[x² + (b/a)x + (b/2a)²] - a(b/2a)² + c
= a[x + (b/2a)]² + (c - b²/4a)

Complete the square for the left side of your equation, and it will look like the right side, but instead of m and n, you'll have numbers, and those are obviously the numbers you're trying to find.
 
Complete the square, to put the equation in the form, (x - n)^2 + m , and then you have your values for n and m.

multiply both sides by -1 , to get, x^2-4x-5 which can be written as (x-2)^2-9 , which is in the form (x - n)^2 + m

so n=2, m=-9
 
roger said:
so n=2, m=-9
Recheck that, roger. The problem states: 5+4x -x^2 = m - (x - n)^2, not 5+4x -x^2 = m + (x - n)^2
Viet Dao,
 
whoops,

m=9
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top