How to get mean occupation numbers by Grand partition function?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the expectation values <n_i> and <n_i^2> for an ideal gas using the grand partition function, the relationship <n_i> = -1/β (∂q/∂ε) and <n_i^2> = 1/Z_G [-(1/β ∂/∂ε)^2 Z_G] is derived from the grand canonical ensemble. The grand partition function Z_G is expressed as Z(β,α) = Tr exp(-βH + αN), where α can be related to the chemical potential. The first and second derivatives of Z with respect to α yield the average particle number <N> and the second moment <N^2>, respectively, with the second derivative reflecting the standard deviation of the particle number. For further reading on statistical mechanics that distinguishes between quantum and classical treatments, alternative references may be suggested for clarity.
hokhani
Messages
556
Reaction score
17
How to calculate &lt;n_i ^2&gt; for an ideal gas by the grand partition function (&lt;n_i&gt; is the occupation number)? In other words, I like to know how do we get to the formula &lt;n_i&gt;=-1/\beta (\frac{\partial q}{\partial\epsilon}) and &lt;n_i ^2&gt;=1/Z_G [-(1/\beta \frac{\partial }{\partial\epsilon})^2 Z_G]?

Z_G is grand partition function , q=ln Z_G and \epsilon is the energy of the corresponding level.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Define
Z(\beta,\alpha)=\mathrm{Tr} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}+\alpha \hat{N}O.
Here, I assume we have a non-relativistic system with conserved particle number \hat{N}.
Then you get
\frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha} Z=Z \langle N \rangle, \quad \frac{\partial^2}{\partial \alpha^2} Z=Z \langle N^2 \rangle.
Now you have
\frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha} \ln Z=\frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial \alpha}=\langle N \rangle
and then
\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \alpha^2} \ln Z=\frac{1}{Z^2} \left (\frac{\partial Z}{\partial\alpha} \right )^2+\frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial^2 Z}{\partial \alpha^2}=\langle N^2 \rangle -\langle N \rangle^2=\sigma_N^2.
So the 2nd derivative of the GK potential wrt. to \alpha is the standard deviation \sigma_N^2 of the particle number, not the expectation value of the particle number squared!

More conventional is to write \alpha = \beta \mu, where \mu is the chemical potential, but then it's a bit inconvenient for evaluating expectation values of the particle number and its powers (or equivalently cumulants of the particle number).
 
vanhees71 said:
Define
Z(\beta,\alpha)=\mathrm{Tr} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}+\alpha \hat{N}O.
Here, I assume we have a non-relativistic system with conserved particle number \hat{N}.
Then you get
\frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha} Z=Z \langle N \rangle, \quad \frac{\partial^2}{\partial \alpha^2} Z=Z \langle N^2 \rangle.
Now you have
\frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha} \ln Z=\frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial \alpha}=\langle N \rangle
and then
\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \alpha^2} \ln Z=\frac{1}{Z^2} \left (\frac{\partial Z}{\partial\alpha} \right )^2+\frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial^2 Z}{\partial \alpha^2}=\langle N^2 \rangle -\langle N \rangle^2=\sigma_N^2.
So the 2nd derivative of the GK potential wrt. to \alpha is the standard deviation \sigma_N^2 of the particle number, not the expectation value of the particle number squared!

More conventional is to write \alpha = \beta \mu, where \mu is the chemical potential, but then it's a bit inconvenient for evaluating expectation values of the particle number and its powers (or equivalently cumulants of the particle number).

Thank you very much for your good response but what I meant by n_i is the number of particles in the ith single particle state with energy \epsilon_i and not the total number of particles, N.
I study the book "statistical mechanics by Pathria". Reading this book is somewhat difficult. Also I think this book (although is a very good book) hasn't well set apart the borders between quantum and classical treatment. Could you please tell me, if there is any, another good reference in that level instead?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
Back
Top