How to get the equation spring equation? Please help me understand

  • Thread starter Thread starter madeeeeee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
To derive the spring equation x=(g/k)Δm + (Minital)(g)/k + xinital, one must start with the force balance between gravitational force and spring force. The gravitational force is expressed as Fg = -g(Minital + ΔM), while the spring force is Fs = kΔx. Setting these forces equal when they cancel gives the equation -kΔx = -g(Minital + ΔM). By rearranging this equation, you can solve for Δx, leading to Δx = g(Minital + ΔM)/k. Finally, substituting Δx back into the equation for x yields the desired result.
madeeeeee
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
How do you use the equations

m=Minital + deltaM
and x=xinital + deltax
and F=-mg

to get x=(g/k)deltaM + ((Minital)(g)/k +xinital)

(where m= mass. Minital is fixed inital mass and deltaM is additional weight added)
(where x= displacement. xinital is when no downward force is applied and deltax is displacement from unstretched position)

please explain how to get this equation

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can't be done. You need one more equation: Force that the spring exerts on a mass = k * extension.
 
so if I use F=-kdeltax than how can I now show the above equation?
 
Perhaps I can help if I understand the problem better. What was the statement of the problem? The equations can come later.
 
m = mi + Δm
Fg = -mg
so
Fg = -g(mi + Δm)

Fs = kΔx (positive since it is acting against gravity)

We are looking for Δx when the forces cancel so
0 = Fg + Fs
-Fs = Fg
-Fs = Fg = -g(mi + Δm) = -kΔx
devide by -k

Δx = g(mi + Δm)/k

The using x = xi + Δx
substitute Δx, multiply out and rearrange a bit and you get

x=(g/k)Δm + (g/k)mi +xi
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top