How to get valid frequency for a transfer function?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the half-power frequency for the transfer function H(s) = 1/(s^2+s+1). Participants clarify that the half-power frequency corresponds to the -3 dB point, where the magnitude of gain decreases by 3 dB from its maximum value. Various calculations yield multiple frequency values, with emphasis on identifying valid frequencies, specifically noting that negative frequencies are often disregarded in real-valued signals. The importance of correctly interpreting the results and ensuring calculations align with the definition of the half-power frequency is highlighted. Ultimately, the valid frequency identified is +1.27, with discussions on the relevance of negative frequencies based on the context of the assignment.
Effy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


transfer function: H(s) = 1/(s^2+s+1).
question: compute half-power frequency

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]I got 4 answers: -0.605i, 0.065i, -1.169, 1.169
I know that only two of these are correct, one is 1.169 instead of -1.169 because frequency cannot be negative. Then I wrote the two imaginary answers into phaser form. I got 0.065<-90degree and 0.065<90 degree. Could someone tell me which phase I should choose and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you come up with those answers yourself, or were they given to you in the problem statement? If they're your work, then it would be much easier to help you if you showed how you came up with them.

The value of 's' is, in some contexts, called 'complex frequency', but I doubt that's what you're after. I think you probably just have to find the -3 dB point(s) of ##H(j \omega)##.
 
milesyoung said:
Did you come up with those answers yourself, or were they given to you in the problem statement? If they're your work, then it would be much easier to help you if you showed how you came up with them.

The value of 's' is, in some contexts, called 'complex frequency', but I doubt that's what you're after. I think you probably just have to find the -3 dB point(s) of ##H(j \omega)##.

Hi,

I wrote the transfer function H(s) into H(w)=1/(-w^2+iw+1)
so the magnitude would be |H(w)|=|1/(-w^2+iw+1)|=1/sqrt(1-w^2+w^4)
|H(w)|max would be sqrt(4/3) when 1-w^2+w^4 is at minimum when w=+ or -1/sqrt(2)
set |H(w)|=1/sqrt(1-w^2+w^4)=1/sqrt(2)*|H(w)|max=sqrt(2/3) and solve for w
since this is a 4th order equation, I got 4 answers. 1 imaginary positive, 1 imaginary negative, 1 real positive, 1 real negative.
Then I'm confused.

What do you mean by -3dB point? I don't know about that.
 
@Effy , i think the answers you calculated are wrong. Please go through it once again.
 
milesyoung said:
Did you come up with those answers yourself, or were they given to you in the problem statement? If they're your work, then it would be much easier to help you if you showed how you came up with them.

The value of 's' is, in some contexts, called 'complex frequency', but I doubt that's what you're after. I think you probably just have to find the -3 dB point(s) of ##H(j \omega)##.

Btw, the original question is a damper-spring-mass system. I got the transfer function from that and I'm pretty sure it's correct.
 
-3db point is called as the cutoff frequency or half power frequency. It is a frequency at which magnitude of gain decreases by 3db from maximum gain.
 
lazyaditya said:
@Effy , i think the answers you calculated are wrong. Please go through it once again.

I've done that several times and I'm still try
lazyaditya said:
-3db point is called as the cutoff frequency or half power frequency. It is a frequency at which magnitude of gain decreases by 3db from maximum gain.

Does it mean that I shouldn't multiply the maximum magnitude by 1/sqrt(2) but subtract 3dB?
 
I meant about the frequency values.
 
I did it roughly .
 

Attachments

  • photo(1).JPG
    photo(1).JPG
    27.2 KB · Views: 452
  • #10
You can subtract 3 db only when the magnitude is also given in decibel .
 

Attachments

  • photo 2(1).JPG
    photo 2(1).JPG
    34.7 KB · Views: 484
  • photo 1(1).JPG
    photo 1(1).JPG
    29.4 KB · Views: 496
  • #11
lazyaditya said:
I did it roughly .

I got the same answers and finally found out what I did wrong. Thank you so much!
But only the +1.27 is a valid frequency, right?
 
  • #12
Effy said:
But only the +1.27 is a valid frequency, right?
That depends on how pedantic your instructor is. You can interpret the real-valued signal ##\cos(\omega t)## as a complex-valued signal:
$$
\cos(\omega t) = \frac{e^{j \omega t} + e^{-j \omega t}}{2}
$$
with frequency components at ##-\omega## and ##\omega##, but I doubt that makes any difference for your assignment. The negative frequency components are redundant if you're only working with real-valued signals, so I think you can easily argue that it's correct to only include the positive frequency component in your answer.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
milesyoung said:
That depends on how pedantic your instructor is. You can interpret the real-valued signal ##\cos(\omega t)## as a complex-valued signal:
$$
\cos(\omega t) = \frac{e^{j \omega t} + e^{-j \omega t}}{2}
$$
with frequency components at ##-\omega## and ##\omega##, but I doubt that makes any difference for your assignment. The negative frequency components are redundant if you're only working with real-valued signals, so I think you can easily argue that it's correct to only include the positive frequency component in your answer.

Got it. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top