How to interpret absolute value bars?

aj-smith
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was further looking into the Cauchy schwarz inequality and i got to a statement as follows:

A·B ≤ |A·B|

However, when I tried to prove this using numbers on paper, I wasn't sure if the absolute value bars distribute among each term, which would lead to |A|·|B|, or if the final product is then absolute.

I was wondering how you would interpret the above statement (assuming all capital letters represent vectors

These are the components I assumed.

A= {1,2} B= {-2,3} c= -2

Also how would the following below be interpreted?

|cA·B|

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aj-smith said:
I was further looking into the Cauchy schwarz inequality and i got to a statement as follows:

A·B ≤ |A·B|

*** I presume you're talking of real inner product spaces since otherwise (i.e., in a complex space) this has no meaning. ***


However, when I tried to prove this using numbers on paper, I wasn't sure if the absolute value bars distribute among each term, which would lead to |A|·|B|, or if the final product is then absolute.


*** You seemed to be using the dot \cdot to represent inner product of two vectors, so |A|\cdot |B| would be the

product of two real NUMBERS, IF by |A| you mean the norm of vector A...something completely different. ***



I was wondering how you would interpret the above statement (assuming all capital letters represent vectors

These are the components I assumed.

A= {1,2} B= {-2,3} c= -2

Also how would the following below be interpreted?

|cA·B|


*** This is the abs. value of the inner product of the vector cA by the vector B, i.e. |(-2,-4)\cdot (-2,3)|=|4-12|=8

DonAntonio


Thank you.

...
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top