How to know when to relate the tangents (Divide components)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cake
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding when to divide components of vectors to relate tangents, particularly in the context of inelastic collisions in two dimensions. Participants express frustration over a lack of clarity in their course materials regarding this technique.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for guidance on recognizing when to apply the method of dividing vector components. They share experiences of encountering this concept in assignments without sufficient explanation from instructors or textbooks.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided examples involving inelastic collisions to illustrate the application of the method. There is an ongoing exploration of the reasoning behind the technique, with no explicit consensus reached on its broader applicability.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that this concept has not been emphasized in tests, leading to confusion about its relevance and application in problem-solving scenarios.

Cake
Messages
100
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


What ques does one need to recognize they need to divide components of two vectors together to "relate the tangents?"

The Attempt at a Solution


Alright, so I've seen this come up a LOT in the semester-dividing components or sums of components together to work out an equation in terms of tangents and to eliminate variables. The thing is my professor and the book we're using don't explain this, and when it's used nobody elaborates. Getting my professor to respond to a question results in a "google it" response. So tell me what I'm missing guys. When are you even supposed to use this trick.

I know there needs to be some indication of work, but all I can say is I've googled, asked around, and done plenty of logistics trying to figure this out, and it's too frustrating to continue on my own.

If you're wondering how I've gotten this far into the semester without knowing this, it hasn't come up on tests, only on one or two homework assignments. But it bugs me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cake said:

Homework Statement


What ques does one need to recognize they need to divide components of two vectors together to "relate the tangents?"

The Attempt at a Solution


Alright, so I've seen this come up a LOT in the semester-dividing components or sums of components together to work out an equation in terms of tangents and to eliminate variables. The thing is my professor and the book we're using don't explain this, and when it's used nobody elaborates. Getting my professor to respond to a question results in a "google it" response. So tell me what I'm missing guys. When are you even supposed to use this trick.

I know there needs to be some indication of work, but all I can say is I've googled, asked around, and done plenty of logistics trying to figure this out, and it's too frustrating to continue on my own.

If you're wondering how I've gotten this far into the semester without knowing this, it hasn't come up on tests, only on one or two homework assignments. But it bugs me.
How about giving a specific example ?
 
Alright so, let's say I've got an inelastic collision in two dimensions. Equal mass cars. One is traveling east at 13 m/s, the other north at an unknown speed. When they collide they bounce off together at a 55 degree angle. The solution looks something like this:

##p_y=mv_?=2mv_f sin(55)##
##p_x=13m=2mv_f cos(55)##
[book notes to divide these without justification]
##\frac {v} {13} = tan (55)##
##v=41.5 mi/hr##

Edit: Fixed units
 
Last edited:
Cake said:
Alright so, let's say I've got an inelastic collision in two dimensions. Equal mass cars. One is traveling east at 13 m/s, the other north at an unknown speed. When they collide they bounce off together at a 55 degree angle. The solution looks something like this:

##p_y=mv_?=2mv_f sin(55)##
##p_x=13m=2mv_f cos(55)##
[book notes to divide these without justification]
##\frac {v} {13} = tan (55)##
##v=41.5 m/s##
It's basic algebra.

Essentially you are saying ##13m=2mv_f \cos(55^\circ)##, so the left side is the same thing as the right side, at least numerically..

Then all you're doing in this method is dividing both sides of the first equation by the same thing.You can get the same result by taking a few more steps.

Solve the first equation for ##\ \sin(55^\circ\,,\ ## and solve the second for ##\ \cos(55^\circ\ . ##

Then get ##\ \tan(55^\circ,\ ## by dividing the two results.
 
SammyS said:
It's basic algebra.

Essentially you are saying ##13m=2mv_f \cos(55^\circ)##, so the left side is the same thing as the right side, at least numerically..

Then all you're doing in this method is dividing both sides of the first equation by the same thing.You can get the same result by taking a few more steps.

Solve the first equation for ##\ \sin(55^\circ\,,\ ## and solve the second for ##\ \cos(55^\circ\ . ##

Then get ##\ \tan(55^\circ,\ ## by dividing the two results.
That's so obnoxiously simple. Thank you though.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K