How to more accurately determine an angle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spike spiegel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on methods for accurately determining the angle at which a book begins to slide when a weight is placed on it. The initial experimental method using trigonometry is deemed the most accurate due to its real-world application, despite the inherent variability in friction measurements. Suggestions for improving accuracy include using a sine bar for mechanical measurement, employing a light source to magnify measurements, or utilizing an electronic inclinometer for direct angle readings. The importance of recognizing the limitations of friction coefficients in simple experiments is emphasized. Overall, various methods can enhance measurement precision beyond basic trigonometric calculations.
spike spiegel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A recent lab involved finding the coefficient of static friction. A book was on a table. A brass weight was placed on the book and one end of the book was raised until the weight began to slide. The angle between the book and the table was found by measuring the height and hypotenuse of the triangle formed and using trigonometry. What would be a more accurate method of finding the angle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking how would you calculate the angle at which the book would slide?

The measurement you made is the most "accurate" because it's experimental and takes into account variables that you will ignore when doing a simple force balance equation. (i.e. when the gravitational force component in the direction of the sliding book equals the frictional force)
 
Coulomb's "laws" of static and dynamic friction are only rough approximations to the "real world". There isn't really much point trying to measure friction coefficients "accurately" (with errors less than about 10%, say) because the result depends on many things that you can't control in a simple experiment.
 
Hello spike;

Since you say you did this as a lab I assume this was a question asked as part of the assignment.

A purely mechanical answer would be to use what is known as a 'sine bar'.
This is a mechancial engineer's improvement of the method you describe - look it up on google.

An opto-mechanical answer would be to shine a light parallel to the sliding surface onto a vertical scale some distance away thus magnifying both the hypotenuse and vertical measurements therby increasing the accuracy.

An electronic method would be to attach an electronic inclinometer to the lifted plane and read out the angle.

There are other ways but these plus google should give you a start.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top