How to perceive probability value in QM?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter leoneri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Qm Value
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of probability values in quantum mechanics (QM), particularly in relation to the Born postulate, the uncertainty principle, and the nature of measurement outcomes in systems like the hydrogen atom. Participants explore the implications of these concepts on the consistency of measurement results and the role of measurement tools.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the implications of the Born postulate and the uncertainty principle on measurement outcomes, questioning whether variations in results are due to inherent quantum uncertainty, measurement limitations, or statistical mechanics considerations.
  • Another participant clarifies that the terms \Delta E and \Delta t refer to standard deviations related to the stability of a quantum state, suggesting that if a system is in a stable state, \Delta E could be zero, leading to infinite \Delta t.
  • A participant acknowledges the relationship between the uncertainty principle and ensemble concepts, indicating that measurements yield a spread of results when repeated, even if the measurement apparatus does not introduce perturbations.
  • Further clarification is provided that repeated measurements of the same parameter across an ensemble will inherently produce a spread of results, reinforcing the idea that results will not be identical.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relationship between the uncertainty principle and the spread of measurement results, but there remains uncertainty about the specific causes of this spread and how it relates to measurement techniques and quantum state stability.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the exact nature of measurement outcomes in quantum systems and the influence of measurement tools versus inherent quantum properties. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the uncertainty principle and its implications for experimental results.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts of quantum mechanics seeking to understand the complexities of measurement and probability in quantum systems, as well as those interested in the philosophical implications of quantum interpretations.

leoneri
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have a confusion right now. To the truth is, I have been studying QM for some years, but somehow, some of its concepts are still not really clear for me.

I understand that one of components of QM interpretation that generally accepted now is the Born postulate that \left|\Psi(x,t)\right|^2dx is the probability to find the particle between x and dx.

Then the uncertainty principle \Delta x \Delta p_x \geq \frac{1}{2} \hbar and \Delta t \Delta E \geq \frac{1}{2} \hbar, tells the inability to precisely measure two non-commuting observables simultaneously.

My confusion is here. For sure that we are able to calculate analytically the energy quantization of system such as H atom, with exact value.

So my question is like this.

If during the energy measurement of H atom, we get different spread results over time and also over position. Is this spread values are due to the uncertainty principle, or because the limitation of our tools in measurements (related to equipment accuracy, etc.), or because we are actually approaching the measurement that we treat the H atoms system as ensembles (so instead of pure QM, we actually doing measurement as explained by statistical mechanics)?? Where is the significance of the exact calculated H atom energy?

Sometimes, I still thinking that if we can calculate exactly the energy of the system, then, in every measurements, we should get the very same identical result.. is this way of thinking is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi leoneri,


What really matters is what you mean by \Delta E and \Delta t. The best place I've read this was Griffith's book.<br /> <br /> It states that \Delta t and \Delta E are the standard deviations of the time required for the state of the body to change by \Delta E.<br /> <br /> In your case, if we know that the body has a given energy, for example the hydrogen atom, then \Delta E = 0 and as it is a stable state then it would take an infinite time to change, i.e. \Delta t = \infty.<br /> <br /> Take care that this has nothing to do with the measurement apparatus used or with the measurement causing any perturbation to the measurement results.<br /> <br /> This meaning is different than the meaning of \Delta x \cdot \Delta p \geq \hbar which talks about the standard deviation measured for an ensemble of identical experiments.
 
Hi Omar, thanks for your reply. Your information from the Griffith's book is really helpful, and your explanation at least confirmed what I have in my mind, that \Delta x \Delta p_x \geq \frac{1}{2} \hbar is somehow related to ensemble concept.

But I am still questioning about spread results. I will refine my question. I still do not really understand with this spread results that usually mentioned in QM books. Is every time we do measurement, we will always get spread results after doing the experiments several time, or not? Assuming the apparatus do not causing perturbation.
 
Hi leoneri,

Thanks to you :).

For the spread mentioned in books; I get is as the following: If we have an ensemble of experiments and we measure the same parameter in all experiments and form a statistical average we will get a spread, i.e. each experiment will give a different result.

For your own argument, if we neglect or consider there is no effect of time evolution or repeated measurement process on the result, then the results will not be identical and we will have a spread in them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K