How to Plan a Mission from LEO to the Itokawa Asteroid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid Earth
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on planning a mission from low Earth orbit (LEO) to the Itokawa asteroid, particularly examining free trajectory options, Δv requirements, and mission times at perihelion and apohelion distances. Participants highlight the need to calculate the necessary delta V for both scenarios, emphasizing the importance of understanding escape velocity and orbital mechanics. The conversation also touches on the pros and cons of each mission option, noting that one may require more fuel while the other could be faster. Specific formulas and resources are shared to assist in these calculations, underscoring the technical nature of the task. Overall, the thread serves as a collaborative effort to solve complex orbital dynamics for the upcoming mission.
brash
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Next year the Hyabusa spacecraft will return to Earth from the asteroid Itokawa. Inspired by this, you are required to report on your individual study of the following:

The free trajectory options, associated Δv requirements and mission times to take a spacecraft from a low Earth orbit (LEO) to a low orbit around Itokawa, if Itokawa is at:

a. perihelion, (147,098,074 Km)
b. apohelion. (152,097,701 Km)
What are the pros and cons of each mission?

LEO is at 8378 Km, How ever I have no idea how to caluclate the oribit of Itokawa, to get the distance between it and LEO. Also having problem geting the change in v.

About Itokawa : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/25143_Itokawa

Hope some one can help. Thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Can anyone help ? Still can't figure it out. Thank you.
 
Free trajectory involves using the mass of the destination to "bend" your flightpath so that you return to your origin without using any fuel for course corrections:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_return_trajectory
Your link gives the escape velocity of Itokawa as approximately .2m/s. I'm guessing that if your delta v were near that (and your trajectory correct), then your spacecraft would do a half orbit and then return. You would still need to know where the Earth is when Itokawa is at points a. and b. to plot a timeline.
 
Normally, you're supposed to put homework questions in the homework help section ( https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=152 ). But you're new so I'll bend a little.

I'm not sure what he means by free trajectory. I was guessing what Arch2008 said, except your question wants it to orbit the asteroid, rather than loop around and come home.

Compute the amount of delta V to get from the orbit of Earth (1 AU) to the the distance of the asteriod at perihelion (147,098.074 km). This is interior to Earth, so you're making Earth the aphelion of this transfer orbit. Formulas 4.18 and 4.19 on BobB's page at http://www.braeunig.us/space/ tell you how to get this velocity. Compute the difference between this velocity and Earth's circular velocity. That's how much delta V you'll need to get to the asteroid at perihelion. You must escape the Earth with enough deltaV that your excess velocity (aka velocity at infinity) equals this amount. Escape velocity with hyperbolic excess is sqrt((2*GM/r)+vinfinity^2). Once you get to the asteroid, compute your encounter velocity (you can probably safely ignore the asteroid's weak gravity). How much higher is this than the velocity for circular orbit around the asteroid? (look up the asteroid's mass, and radius and use the circular velocity formula). You'll need that much deltaV to brake into orbit. As for the time, compute the semi-major axis of your transfer orbit. From that you can compute the period. You're doing half an orbit to get there, so divide this by 2.

Repeat above for the asteroid's aphelion. As for pros and cons, one way takes more fuel (deltaV) than the other. One is also faster than the other. So draw your own conclusions after you've parts a and b.
 
hahahah... it's due monday so you better get a move on.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top