How to produce a standing wave question

  • Thread starter Thread starter michaelraymen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Standing wave Wave
AI Thread Summary
A standing wave can be produced on a wire of length 1 meter if the wavelength is an integer fraction of the length. For wavelengths of 30 cm, 1 m, and 75 cm, standing waves can be formed because they fit into the wire as integer multiples of half wavelengths. However, a wavelength of 2 m cannot produce a standing wave since it exceeds the wire's length and does not fit as an integer multiple. The fundamental mode requires that the length of the wire accommodates a whole number of half wavelengths. Visualizing or sketching the scenarios can aid in understanding the conditions for standing wave formation.
michaelraymen
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


using a wire of length L= 1 M with both ends fixed, can you produce a standing wave with the following wavelengths? Explain why or why no.

a. 30 cm:

b. 1m :

c. 75 cm :

d. 2 m :


Homework Equations


L=n. (λn/2)


The Attempt at a Solution



1m= n. 30 cm/2 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A standing wave must fit a full "wave" inside the given length. In other words the length must be an integer multiple of the wavelength.
 
So would all of the wave lengths work except for the 2 meter one?And How can I explain it with the formula?

Thank you for your help.
 
michaelraymen said:

Homework Statement


using a wire of length L= 1 M with both ends fixed, can you produce a standing wave with the following wavelengths? Explain why or why no.

a. 30 cm:

b. 1m :

c. 75 cm :

d. 2 m :


Homework Equations


L=n. (λn/2)


The Attempt at a Solution



1m= n. 30 cm/2 ?

HallsofIvy said:
A standing wave must fit a full "wave" inside the given length. In other words the length must be an integer multiple of the wavelength.

For a string or wire fixed at both ends, the fundamental mode fits a half wavelength between the nodes, no?
 
michaelraymen said:
So would all of the wave lengths work except for the 2 meter one?And How can I explain it with the formula?

Thank you for your help.

Welcome to the PF.

I'd suggesting sketching each of the possible answers, to see if you get a whole number of half wavelengths between the nodes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top