How to Prove E and H Satisfy Maxwell's Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter likephysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwells equations
likephysics
Messages
638
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I am trying to solve prob 4.107 in Schaums' Vector analysis book.

Show that solution to Maxwells equations -

\DeltaxH=1/c dE/dt, \DeltaxE= -1/c dH/dt, \Delta.H=0, \Delta.E= 4pi\rho
where \rho is a function of x,y,z and c is the velocity of light, assumed constant, are given by

E = -\Delta\phi-1/c dE/dt, H= \DeltaxA

where A and \phi, called the vector and scalar potentials, respectively satisfy the equations
\Delta.A + 1/c d\phi/dt =0
\Delta^2 \phi - 1/c (d^2 \phi/dt^2) = -4pi\rho
\Delta^2 A = 1/c^2 (d^2A/dt^2)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand the problem. Should I show that E = -\Delta\phi-1/c dE/dt, H= \DeltaxA satisfies the vector and scalar potential equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi likephysics! :smile:

(have a delta: ∆ and a phi: φ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
likephysics said:
Should I show that E = -\Delta\phi-1/c dE/dt, H= \DeltaxA satisfies the vector and scalar potential equations?

No, you should assume that the A,φ equations are satisfied, and then prove that E and H (derived from A and φ) satisfy Maxwell's equations. :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
No, you should assume that the A,φ equations are satisfied, and then prove that E and H (derived from A and φ) satisfy Maxwell's equations. :smile:

I disagree, that seems to be proving the reverse statement of what the problem statement asks for.

I would assume that E and H satisfy Maxwell's equations (so that they are solutions to said equations, as per the first premise of the problem statement), then substitute in your expressions for them in terms of the vector and scalar potentials (the second premise of the problem statement) and use appropriate vector product rules to show that Maxwell's equations, in terms of the potentials, reduce to the final 3 equations you are given (the intended conclusion).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top