How to prove the radius of curvature at any point on a line?

catheee
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In a magnetic field, field lines are curves to which the magnetic induction B is everywhere tangetial. By evaluating dB/ds where s is the distance measured along a field line, prove that the radius of curvature at any point on a line is given by

density symbol-->p= B^3 / [ B x( B * del) B]

where do i start with this?? I have absolutely no idea. please help with start with a direction to go.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi catheee, welcome to PF!:smile:

This forum supports \LaTeX, which allows you to write equations in a clear manner...

catheee said:
density symbol-->p= B^3 / [ B x( B * del) B]

\rho=\frac{B^3}{\textbf{B}\times(\textbf{B}\cdot\mathbf{\nabla})\textbf{B}}

^^^Is this what you mean?

where do i start with this??

A good place to start might be with the (mathematical) definition of radius of curvature for a general curve...what equation(s) do you have for that?
 
yes! that's the equation I have, but its the only equation I was given and I was told to solve it, I don't see anything about the radius of curvature equation in the textbook I have. So, what you're saying is that I should get the radius of curvation equation and then use it to solve the problem?

btw, thanks for answering my question!
 
catheee said:
yes! that's the equation I have,
Really?!:bugeye:

\textbf{B}\times(\textbf{B}\cdot\mathbf{\nabla})\textbf{B} is a vector whereas \rho and B^3 are both scalars...how exactly does one divide a scalar by a vector to produce another scalar?!
but its the only equation I was given and I was told to solve it, I don't see anything about the radius of curvature equation in the textbook I have.
Out of curiosity, what textbook is this problem from? It might be easier to see what they expect you to do if I scan through the text quickly.

So, what you're saying is that I should get the radius of curvation equation and then use it to solve the problem?

btw, thanks for answering my question!

Of course! How on Earth would you find what the radius of curvature for a certain curve is without knowing the definition of 'radius of curvature'? Surely, basic vector calculus is a prerequisite for studying whatever course this text is for?
 
im using introduction to electrodynamics by griffiths 3rd edition.
oh and sorry about double posting i didnt know that that was against the rules.
:)
im looking up the def of radius of curvature but it doesn't look like any of the equations would apply to this problem. Ughh
 
catheee said:
im using introduction to electrodynamics by griffiths 3rd edition.

I am familiar with that text, but it won't be of much help for this problem.
im looking up the def of radius of curvature but it doesn't look like any of the equations would apply to this problem. Ughh

Okay, if I gave you the equation of some parameterized curve \textbf{r}(u)=x(u)\hat{x}+y(u)\hat{y}+z(u)\hat{z}, could you calculate the radius of curvature? Could you calculate the (unnormalized) tangent vector?

If so, then let \textbf{r}(u) describe one of your field lines...what does the fact that \textbf{B}\left(\textbf{r}(u)\right) is tangent to \textbf{r}(u) tell you?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top