How to Self-Study Calculus - Comments

  • Insights
  • Thread starter micromass
  • Start date

Answers and Replies

  • #2
694
114
Nice one micromass! I've always thought about what this kind of list should constitute, and you've covered it really well. Before this, I was forced to say "you need Calc I, II, III and DEs to understand physics well" to my friends, but had a really hard time explaining the contents of each in detail. Well, I have a great reference now:woot:
 
  • #3
22,089
3,286
Thanks a lot PWiz, I appreciate it. If you think I've missed something, please do tell!
 
  • #4
694
114
Thanks a lot PWiz, I appreciate it. If you think I've missed something, please do tell!
IMHO, "parametric equations" and "calculus in different coordinate systems" (or something along those lines) should be included in the post somewhere under the Multivariable section, but other than that, I think your post pretty much covers all the bases.
 
  • #5
22,089
3,286
Yes, very good! I will edit this in.
 
  • #6
15
2
I would like to share a recommendation: G.M. Fichtenholz "Differential and Integral Calculus". Fairly unpopular outside of the 'post-Soviet' countries, but it is among my personal favourites. A bit on the lengthy side, but it keeps a very approachable and 'eager to explain' tone just as easily when talking about basic differentiation and application of multi-variable functional series and transforms. Book genuinely 'feels' like a transcript from a very patient tutor. Plus it makes it a point to show worked-out examples to almost every single concept.

It is also among the most complete resources when it comes for computational techniques, so if not for any other point it is still worth at least as a reference on solving problems.
 
  • #7
17
9
I will be learning calculus for the first time shortly and it's nice to have a guide like this. Your posts are tremendously helpful for beginners like me, it is much appreciated!
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #8
86
6
I'm afraid you posted a wrong link for the "Calculus in 3D: Geometry, vectors and multivariate calculus by Nitecki".
This works better: http://www.tufts.edu/~znitecki/Hardcore2.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes micromass
  • #9
IGU
267
64
You seem to be presenting this as a "one true way". For instance, you say differentiation is a prerequisite for learning integration. I'll note that Apostol does it the other way around, likely because historically that's the way it happened. Do you think that self-teaching from Apostol is a bad idea?

I'm just thinking you might want to make the tone a bit more "here's one way to do it" than it is now. In any case, kudos on recommending free texts! That's certainly one thing Apostol's Calculus does not have going for it, regardless of how good it might be.
 
  • #10
22,089
3,286
You seem to be presenting this as a "one true way".
I don't think I have said or implied anything remotely like that.
 
  • #11
IGU
267
64
You seem to be presenting this as a "one true way".
I don't think I have said or implied anything remotely like that.
Lest I be misunderstood in offering criticism, let me say thank you for doing this. It's a meritorious effort and will be helpful to many, I'm sure.

My impression regarding it being presented as the "one true way" came from these statements:
The best calculus book is undoubt[ed]ly.... (highly controversial)
So it is very beneficial to learn the nonstandard approach. (controversial at best)

But I agree those are not representative of the whole piece. However, the impression I get is that you think these textbook suggestions are right for everybody. I've found that people have different styles and need different things. Some love examples, some hate them. Some need rigor and others prefer intuition. Some like exercises aplenty, and others prefer a few well-chosen problems. Some want an answer key and others find it too tempting and prefer it doesn't exist. Some want their mathematics pure and others find it dry as dust if there isn't real world motivation.

It would help, I think, if you indicate who your recommendations are for. If you really think they'll work for everybody, I'm suspicious.
 
  • #12
45
20
The texts are just his recommendations. And it makes much more sense to introduce differentiation before integration.
 
  • Like
Likes PWiz
  • #13
49
4
Hmm interesting, of all those topics (it took me 2 semesters to get over them) the courses i took on the matter never talked about multi variable Taylor series, Laplace transform, or system of ODEs :c, maybe i should try to learn those on my own.
Also, about "vector calculus" section, does that mean Green's, Gauss' and Stokes' theorem?
Very good, organized, and easy to read.
Cheers :D
 
  • #14
22,089
3,286
Hmm interesting, of all those topics (it took me 2 semesters to get over them) the courses i took on the matter never talked about multi variable Taylor series, Laplace transform, or system of ODEs :c, maybe i should try to learn those on my own.
Also, about "vector calculus" section, does that mean Green's, Gauss' and Stokes' theorem?
Very good, organized, and easy to read.
Cheers :D
Yes, vector calculus is stuff like Stokes' theorem.

Of course it is very likely that your courses did not cover everything of this. I don't think it is really absolutely necessary to go back and learn them on your own (unless you enjoy learning this stuff of course, in which case: go ahead). If you ever meet one of those topics later, you can still go back and learn them.
 
  • #15
entropy1
Gold Member
1,069
61
I just ordered the book of Mary Boas. How does that compare with these books?
 
  • #16
45
20
Boas is a math methods for physics and engineering. It has less emphasis on theory, and goes over different subjects such as LA, DE's, vector calc, basically everything an undergrad physics major will need. If you're a physics major It will benefit you tremendously to work through it.
 
  • #17
22,089
3,286
I just ordered the book of Mary Boas. How does that compare with these books?
It doesn't compare at all with these books. They are very different. First of all, Boas does not cover single variable calculus. It starts with series and multivariable calculus. So it assumes you know integrals and derivatives already.
Second and most important, Boas is for physicists who don't really care much about the underlying math. So if you want to know the math in detail, then Boas is not good. If you simply wish to use it as a tool, then Boas is truly an excellent resource.
 
  • #18
entropy1
Gold Member
1,069
61
Well, I'll just have to buy another book then... :frown:
 
  • #19
22,089
3,286
Well, I'll just have to buy another book then... :frown:
What is your goal? What kind of book do you want?
 
  • #20
entropy1
Gold Member
1,069
61
What is your goal? What kind of book do you want?
I really want to understand the math behind quantum mechanics... :frown:
 
  • #21
22,089
3,286
Send me a PM, I might be able to help :)
 
  • #22
53
1
Hi,

What is your opinion on Courant's introduction books on calculus ?

Thanks
 
  • #23
343
12
Nice to see Keisler's "An infinitesimal approach to calculus" in the list. Great post.
 
  • Like
Likes micromass
  • #24
22,089
3,286
Hi,

What is your opinion on Courant's introduction books on calculus ?

Thanks
It's a very nice book. But don't use it as first calculus book, since it's too difficult for that. It is very suitable as a second course though, if you enjoy the book.
 
  • Like
Likes Physicaa
  • #25
850
146
It's a very nice book. But don't use it as first calculus book, since it's too difficult for that. It is very suitable as a second course though, if you enjoy the book.
Can I skip first two chapters of third book if I followed the first book ?
 

Related Threads on How to Self-Study Calculus - Comments

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
5K
Top