How to Set Lower Limit for Intergration on Vector Magnetic Potential Problem

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294

Homework Statement


My question is mainly on the set up of the limits of the integral.

The original question is:

Find vector magnetic potential A distance s from a infinite long straight wire carrying DC current I.



The Attempt at a Solution




Let wire on z-axis and \vec I = \hat z I

\nabla \times \vec A = \vec B = \hat {\phi} \frac {\mu_0 I}{2\pi r}

We know A is same direction as I and is function of r in this case.

\nabla \times \vec A = \nabla \times \hat z A_{(r)}} = \hat {\phi} \frac {\partial A_{(r)}}{\partial r} = \hat {\phi} \frac {\mu_0 I}{2\pi r}

\Rightarrow\; \vec A_{(s)} = \frac {\mu_0 I}{2\pi} \int \frac 1 r dr

The book use

\vec A_{(s)} = \frac {\mu_0 I}{2\pi} \int^s_b \frac 1 r dr

Where b is a constant.

My question is how do you justify using b as the lower limit. I understand b cannot be zero. But how do you justify using b constant?

My main question is how do you set the lower limit in this case.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


I think it's just a case of the familiar idea that you can always add an arbitrary constant to the potential. The lower limit on the integral adds a constant to A, and since the derivative of a constant is 0, that doesn't affect the B field. So your last integral is the potential at radius s relative to some point b.
 


Mike Pemulis said:
I think it's just a case of the familiar idea that you can always add an arbitrary constant to the potential. The lower limit on the integral adds a constant to A, and since the derivative of a constant is 0, that doesn't affect the B field. So your last integral is the potential at radius s relative to some point b.

Thanks alot, now I remember that I can choose any A as long as I can satisfy

\nabla \times \vec A =\vec B \;\hbox { and } \nabla \cdot \vec A = 0

and any b will satisfy this!

Thanks

Alan
 


b is just an arbitrary constant. You can easily show that whatever b happens to be, the equation curl A=B is still satisfied.

Incidentally, the book's solution is not the most general possible. You can add any curl-free field to it and get an expression that still satisfies curl(A)=B.
 


Oops, Mike already answered.
 


Your equation (and therefore your integral) are wrong.

Where is s?

The integral limits must run from - to + infinity along the wire.
 


Antiphon said:
Your equation (and therefore your integral) are wrong.

Where is s?


They don't. There's no s because the OP decided to use r to represent distance from the wire. His solution would be perfectly fine if he used s instead.

The integral limits must run from - to + infinity along the wire.

They don't. The indefinite integral solves curl(A)=B; a definite integral is equivalent to a constant, and would always have curl(A)=0.
 
Back
Top