How to set the Magdeberg hemispheres in motion (propulsion)?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Magdeburg hemispheres experiment, originally designed to showcase atmospheric pressure and vacuum. The user proposes a system where a propeller attached to one hemisphere creates a pressure difference, potentially setting the entire setup in motion. Clarifications are sought regarding the effectiveness of the propeller in generating thrust and whether the vacuum inside the sphere affects propulsion. It is noted that if the propeller is part of the system, it functions similarly to a propeller-driven train, with the vacuum being irrelevant to the propulsion mechanics. The user also questions the need for a 'reverse' propeller after discovering that their current propeller pushes air backward when rotated counter-clockwise.
royp
Messages
55
Reaction score
22
TL;DR
Experiment of Magdeburg hemispheres demonstrates the 'strength' of the air pressure. When the air was pumped out of the sealed sphere, the sphere contained a vacuum (mostly). and could not be pulled apart by teams of horses. This thread is to discuss how to set the 'empty' sphere in motion by air propulsion.
This is about the famous, classic experiment of Magdeburg hemispheres with the Wikipedia link below:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magdeburg_hemispheres.

"The experiment was designed to demonstrate the vacuum pump invented by Otto von Guericke - but also the tremendous 'strength' of the atmospheric pressure. In the experiment, when the air was pumped out of the sealed sphere, the sphere contained a vacuum (mostly) and could not be pulled apart by teams of horses."
My topic goes further from here. After the horses failed and got tired, let the sphere be detached and placed in front of me, stationary. Clearly, though the sphere contains vacuum inside and there are pressure differences between inside and outside of the sphere, it does not move as there are balancing air pressures on the left and right hemispheres - from outside. Now, I attach a propeller (with a power source - battery) to the right hemisphere and the entire system is placed and firmly attached on a wheeled platform. Now, when the propeller starts to rotate and push the 'air' in front, forward - the entire system will be set in motion; moving to my right. This is because there are now more pressure on the left hemisphere than on the right hemisphere.
Is my understanding correct? Please let me know. I have few more questions on this but I want to ask those later.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The propeller has thrust because it pushes air. The sphere partly blocks the movement of air, so the aerodynamic drag of the sphere reduces the thrust of the propeller. The inside of the sphere, whether empty (vacuum) or solid sphere material, makes no difference to the system.

It is always a good idea to post a diagram showing exactly what you are trying to communicate.
 
Thanks, jrmichler . I will come back with a proper diagram.
 
If the propeller is anchored to the ground then you can push the spheres (just like every other object). If the propeller is part of the setup then you just made a propeller-driven train. The sphere will reduce the efficiency of the propeller a bit but won't do much otherwise. In both cases the vacuum doesn't matter.
 
Thanks, mfb. The propeller is part of the setup. Though I replied earlier to jrmichler to illustrate my question with diagrams, I want, nonetheless, to continue with the momentum at the moment.

My understanding is: the prop will push the air forward to get the propulsion (somewhat like an exhaust fan sucking the air out). There will be higher pressure behind the prop and lower in front. This pressure difference will cause the sphere to move forward by pushing the propeller from behind. If the prop were a (table) fan, a person standing in front will feel the rush of air on his/her body.

With this understanding, I have recently purchased a propeller . There was a good deal of communication before, as I wanted a propeller to be attached to an electric motor (shaft) rotating counter-clockwise. It was supposed to be a 'pusher'. But what I discovered that the propeller, when rotated counter-clockwise, pushing the air backwards. Do I need a 'reverse' propeller? Was my understanding of the propulsion wrong?

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
The propeller will always produce more thrust than your spheres might from the airflow from the propeller.

A sketch would be nice.
 
Thread 'Aero/Hydro-dynamic Streamlining as a function of medium'
My thoughts were inspired by a passing utility vehicle on the highway. They had a device strapped to their truck that had its bulk toward the rear, like one might naively do if one wanted it to slice into the wind. I thought it should have its bulk toward the front like most highly-streamlined cars do: But that got me wondering why it seems to be different for land vehicles than for aircraft. Aircraft (even subsonic craft) seem to go with the very pointy nose profile. And that reminded...
During the flight, NTSB noted, the plane at one point reached well above maximum operating speed and lifted the aircraft about 10,000 feet in nearly 20 seconds. The plane then “rapidly” dipped 25,000 feet, per the agency. “A climb/descent cycle repeated about three times over a two- to three-minute period, which resulted in the airplane re-entering a cloud layer,” the report reads. “After landing, 24 of the 246 passengers were evaluated by emergency medical technicians, with 18 transported...

Similar threads