How to show that this function is continuous at 0?

nerdz4lyfe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For all real numbers, f is a function satisfying |f(x)|<=|x|. Show that f is continuous at 0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Really stuck on this cause I'm confused with the absolute values on this function.

I *think* to show this you have to see if lim x>0+f(x) = lim x>0-f(x) = f(0) ?

And I tried doing this:
-|x|<=f(x)<=|x|
lim x>0+|x|=0
lim x>0- -|x|=0
f(0)=|0|=0
So they're all equal to 0.

I don't know if this is right though...help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what is the definition of continuous? show that each part of the definition is satisfied by the function and you've shown it is continuous.

If you notice that the slope of f(x) is bounded by the absolute value curve to be: 1>= slope >= -1 on either side of 0
 
Last edited:
That's what I tried to do here.

The definition of a function being continuous at 0 is that lim x>0 f(x) = f(0)
So I tried to show the limit exists if the left and right hand limits are equal. And that this limit also equals f(0).

I guess what I'm more confused about then, is the function itself. I don't know how to deal with the fact that the function is shown as part of an inequality, and with the absolute values
 
nerdz4lyfe said:
That's what I tried to do here.

The definition of a function being continuous at 0 is that lim x>0 f(x) = f(0)
So I tried to show the limit exists if the left and right hand limits are equal. And that this limit also equals f(0).

I guess what I'm more confused about then, is the function itself. I don't know how to deal with the fact that the function is shown as part of an inequality, and with the absolute values

Your work is nearly correct. You can now simply used the squeeze theorem, sandwiching f(x) between -|x| and |x|, so that it does satisfy the continuity definition by getting \lim_{x\to 0} f(x) = 0
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top