How to solve for i in compounding interest formula A=P(1+i)^n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cjp88
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve for i in the compounding interest formula A=P(1+i)^n, the correct approach involves using the formula (A/P)^(1/n) - 1 = i. In the example of doubling money from 1 to 2 over 5 years, substituting the values gives (2/1)^(1/5) - 1 = i. The error arises when not using brackets correctly in the calculator; entering 2^1/5 results in an incorrect calculation. The proper input should be 2^(1/5), which yields approximately 1.14869, leading to the correct interest rate of about 0.149. Proper bracket usage in calculations is essential for accurate results.
cjp88
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble understanding how to solve for i. This is the formula for compounding interest. I'm reading this example which shows how to solve for i if you double your money in 5 years. So it gives this example:

(A/P)^1/n - 1 = i

So it gives A for 2 and P for 1, n would be 5 so the answer should be:

(2/1)^1/n - 1 = i

They shown the answer as 0.149 however I cannot get this same answer for whatever reason.

When I put in 2/1 I get 2, then 2^1/5 would be 0.4, minus 1 would make it -0.6.

If this answer is indeed right, could someone please show me what I'm missing.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2^\frac{1}{5} can't be 0.4, since (0.4)^5 is way smaller than 1 (since 0.4<1).

Since 0.4 = 2/5, you must've raised 2 to the 1th (which is two) and divided that answer by 5.
If you're using a calculator, be sure to put in the brackets correctly: 2^(1/5)-1.
 
I see what the problem was, I wasn't using brackets on my calculator. If I do 2^1/5 I get the wrong answer because it does 2^1 which is 2 then divides by 5 to get 0.4 instead of 2^(1/5) being 1.14869...

Thanks for the help on seeing my error.
 
Yes, if you just put in "2^1/5", your calculator interprets that as (2^1)/5 = 2/5= .4.
Use 2^(1/5) instead.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top