How to Solve Integrals on a Sphere Using Pathria's Stat. Mech. Approach?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumDefect
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a specific integral involving multiple variables constrained within a sphere, as outlined in Problem 2.9. The user expresses frustration with Pathria's lack of detailed explanations on the methodology, feeling lost in understanding the general approach. They attempt to redefine variables to simplify the integral but still struggle with the underlying theory. The user seeks additional resources or guidance to better grasp the concepts involved. Overall, the thread highlights a need for clearer instructional materials on this topic.
QuantumDefect
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Problem 2.9

Solve the integral:
\begin{equation}
\int \dddot \int dx_{1}dx_{2}\dddot dx_{N}
\end{equation}

where
\begin{equation}
0 \geq \sum_{i=1}^{N}x_{i} \leq R\]
\end{equation}

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My issue is not really this problem but the general how-to. Pathria, it seems, does not like explaining the how and the why and instead thinks that a single example in Appendix C suffices. My attempt at a solution includes defining

\begin{equation}
x_{i} = u_{i}^{2}
\end{equation}

in order to get the hypervolume defined on a sphere as the condition becomes

\begin{equation}
0 \geq \sum_{i=1}^{N}u_{i}^{2} \leq R
\end{equation}

this is it however since the general theory is not explained. I have never felt so lost before...if anyone could point me to a good resource(I have yet to find any example or explanation online) or could give me a push in the right direction, it would be appreciated.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bah, my TeX is apparently incompatible, sorry.
 
Instead of begin equation use
[ tex] and [ /tex] to open and close your tex environment (without the spaces).
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top