How to Solve Vibrations of a Rectangular Membrane with a Hole?

VktGS
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to solve the vibrations of a rectangular membrane with a rectangular hole inside. Both the inner and outer edges are fixed. I know i have to use the wave equation, but how do i write the boundary conditions in orden to incluye the hole? Any ideas?

F.Y.I. I already know how to solve a rectangular membrane, the thing is that i don't know how to include the hole

Homework Equations



\frac{d^2u}{dt^2} = c^2 \nabla^2 u

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that some of the boundary conditions must be

u(0,y,t)=u(x,0,t)=u(a,y,t)=u(x,b,t)=0

With a the length of the membrane and b it's width. It should also contain a hole inside of length c and width d. I don't know what to do from here. My guess is that i have to put some kind of boundary conditions. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi VktGSWelcome to PF! :smile:

Why not put the origin at the centre? :wink:
 
If the inner edges of the hole are also fixed, then you should just use the Dirichlet boundary conditions (that is, u=0 at the boundary)
 
Thanks for the centre idea, tiny-tim. Very useful.

And, F.Y.I. clamtox, i know what Dirichlet boundary conditions are, just didn't know how to express them in this problem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top