How to solve when x is an exponent and a base

  • Thread starter Thread starter JungleJesus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Exponent
JungleJesus
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Just out of curiosity, I was wondering how to solve for x in an expression of the form
ax = xb

It kinda tripped me out at first.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is no way in general to solve this kind of equation in terms of elementary functions.
 
You can try manipulating it to fit the lambert W function I think.
 
Anonymous217 said:
You can try manipulating it to fit the lambert W function I think.
Yes. Taking the "b"th root of both sides, (a^{1/b})^x= x so that 1= xe^{-(1/b)(ln a)x}. Multiply on both sides by -(1/b)ln a: -(1/b)ln a= (-(1/b)(ln a)x)e^{-(1/b)(ln a)x}.

Letting y= -(1/b)(ln a)x, that becomes ye^y= -(1/b)ln a. Using the Lambert W function (which is defined as the inverse function to f(x)= xex) we have y= W(-(1/b)ln a).

Then x= -\frac{b}{ln a}W(-(1/b)ln a)
 
HallsofIvy said:
Letting y= -(1/b)(ln a)x, that becomes ye^y= -(1/b)ln a. Using the Lambert W function (which is defined as the inverse function to f(x)= xex) we have y= W(-(1/b)ln a).

Then x= -\frac{b}{ln a}W(-(1/b)ln a)

Is there any way to simplify this expression, or is this the bare bones? How would one procede to calculate this value?
 
JungleJesus said:
Is there any way to simplify this expression, or is this the bare bones? How would one procede to calculate this value?

There are numerical methods, like Newton's method or the secant method, that can give numerical values for the W function -- or even your original function directly. (If you just want the W function, there are optimizations that can be used to make it go faster.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top