How to think about entropy microstates/macrostates for a gas in a box

  • Thread starter Thread starter gsingh2011
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Entropy Gas
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the analogy of entropy using Brian Greene's coin flipping example, where microstates represent specific outcomes and macrostates represent the overall count of heads. It confirms that a low entropy state, like all coins heads up, has fewer microstates compared to a high entropy state, such as 50 heads, which has many configurations. This concept is applied to gas particles in a box, illustrating that a confined gas has fewer microstates than when the gas is spread out in a larger volume, resulting in higher entropy. The conversation highlights the complexity of understanding entropy through statistical mechanics and the distinction between thermodynamic equilibrium and entropy itself. Overall, the interpretation of entropy as a measure of the number of configurations available to a system is affirmed.
gsingh2011
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to relate an analogy from Brian Greene about entropy microstates/macrostates to the real world. In the analogy, you have 100 coins that you flip. The microstate is which particular coins landed heads up. The macrostate is the total number of coins that are heads up. So a low entropy configuration would be when all the coins are heads up. There is only one microstate that corresponds to that macrostate. But there is a very large number of microstates that correspond to the macrostate where 50 coins are heads up, and that is a high entropy configuration.

So relating this to a gas in a box, let me know if this understanding is correct. If all of the particles of a gas in a box are contained within a small cubic region in the corner of the box, an external observer would measure a particular pressure and temperature for the gas. And while there may be other configurations (configuration means positions/velocities of each particle) of the gas in the box that would get those same pressure/temperature readings, there aren't that many of them. However, if the gas is spread out throughout the box, and you measure the pressure/temperature, there are a large number of other configurations of the particles that result in the same reading.

Is that a correct interpretation of entropy?
 
Science news on Phys.org
gsingh2011 said:
I'm trying to relate an analogy from Brian Greene about entropy microstates/macrostates to the real world. In the analogy, you have 100 coins that you flip. The microstate is which particular coins landed heads up. The macrostate is the total number of coins that are heads up. So a low entropy configuration would be when all the coins are heads up. There is only one microstate that corresponds to that macrostate. But there is a very large number of microstates that correspond to the macrostate where 50 coins are heads up, and that is a high entropy configuration.

So relating this to a gas in a box, let me know if this understanding is correct. If all of the particles of a gas in a box are contained within a small cubic region in the corner of the box, an external observer would measure a particular pressure and temperature for the gas. And while there may be other configurations (configuration means positions/velocities of each particle) of the gas in the box that would get those same pressure/temperature readings, there aren't that many of them. However, if the gas is spread out throughout the box, and you measure the pressure/temperature, there are a large number of other configurations of the particles that result in the same reading.

Is that a correct interpretation of entropy?
It can be very difficult and tricky to conceptualize entropy using the statistical mechanics micro-canonical ensemble model. If you want to use your example, compare the number of microstates that could exist for the particles of a gas in thermodynamic equilibrium at temperature T and confined to a space V to the number of microstates that could fit the same gas at temperature T and in thermodynamic equilibrium but confined to a much larger space, say 10V.

There would be many more microstates that would define the same thermodynamic equilibrium macrostate at 10V than at V because the particles would have the same speed distribution but could have many more positions available. So the 10V state has higher entropy.

But if the particles occupying the larger volume were in thermodynamic equilibrium at a lower temperature, then there might not be more microstates that would define the larger volume macrostate as the range of possible particle speeds has decreased. This illustrates the difficulty in conceptualizing entropy this way.

Note: There is the statistical mechanics/micro canonical ensemble explanation of entropy. Then there is kinetic theory which explains thermodynamic equilibrium as a statistical concept. Boltzmann figures prominently in both. But, while there are similarities, they are two distinct concepts: 1. thermodynamic equilibrium as a state in which the distribution of particle speeds/energies follows a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. 2. Entropy deals with systems in, and transitions between, states of thermodynamic equilibrium.

AM
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Back
Top