How to Use Induction to Prove 2^n+1 = 2^(n+1)-1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonroberts74
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of mathematical induction to prove the formula \(2^0 + 2^1 + 2^2 + \ldots + 2^n = 2^{n+1} - 1\) for \(n \ge 0\). Participants explore various approaches to establish the validity of this statement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants present a direct application of induction, while others suggest alternative methods, such as using properties of geometric series. Questions arise regarding the clarity of presentation and the logical flow of the induction steps.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering different perspectives and methods. Some have provided constructive feedback on the clarity of the original post, while others have introduced alternative proofs. There is no explicit consensus on a single approach, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that the original poster may have struggled with the presentation of their proof, and some participants emphasize the importance of following the forum's posting guidelines. The discussion also hints at the possibility of proving the statement without induction, which adds complexity to the conversation.

jonroberts74
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
2^0+2^1+2^2+...+2^n=2^{n+1}-1;n \ge 0

P(0) 2^0=2^{0+1}-1 \rightarrow 1=1

P(k) = 2^{k+1}-1


1+2+2^2+2^k+2^{k+1}=2^{k+1}-1+2^{k+1}

2^{k+2}-1 = 2^{k+1}-1+2^{k+1}

= 2^{k+1}(1+1)-1

= 2^{k+1}(2)-1

= 2^{k+1+1}-1

= 2^{k+2}-1

??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution is fine, but your presentation is hard to follow. As you know, you need to prove that ##2^0=2^1-1## and then that if ##1+\cdots+2^{k}=2^{k+1}-1## then ##2^0+\cdots+2^{k+1}=2^{k+2}-1##. To prove the former, I would just write ##2^0=1=2^1-1##. The calculation that proves the latter is much easier to follow in this form:
$$2^0+\cdots+2^{k+1}=(2^0+\cdots+2^k)+2^{k+1} =(2^{k+1}-1)+2^{k+1} =2\cdot 2^{k+1}-1=2^{k+2}-1.$$ Next time use the template. The moderators may delete your post if you don't.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
You can also prove this without induction.

Proposition: ##x^n - 1 = (x - 1)(1 + x + ... + x^{n-1})##.

The above is easily shown by distributing the entire ##(1 + x + ... + x^{n-1})## on the right hand side to yield: ##(x + x^2 + ... + x^n) - (1 + x + ... + x^{n-1})##.

Now if you plug in 2 for x, you get what you were looking to prove.
 
Or, alternatively$$
s = 2^0+2^1+...+2^n$$ $$
2s=2^1+2^2+...+2^n+2^{n+1}$$Subtract the first from the second:$$
s=-2^0+2^{n+1} =2^{n+1}-1$$It's just the old geometric series trick.
 
I think what you are struggling with is a way of thinking about the algebra logic.

You assume P(k) in the induction. (Make certain to state this as an assumption.) You want to show P(k+1) holds by starting with the left-hand side and using the P(k) assumption. I'm writing ? to indicate that I stop and think, what type of relation can I make from the known information.

##2^0 + 2^1 + \cdots + 2^k + 2^{k+1} = ?## Given LHS.
##= (2^0 + 2^1 + \cdots + 2^k) + 2^{k+1} = ?## Recognize P(k)
##= (2^{k+1} -1) + 2^{k+1} = ?## Substitute P(k).
##=2(2^{k+1}) -1 = ? ## Regrouping.
##=2^{(k+1)+1} - 1## Determined RHS.

Your solution has a lot of extraneous information, so I think you are trying to "balance" an equation. You really just have to set up a series of relations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K