How to Use Induction to Prove 2^n+1 = 2^(n+1)-1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonroberts74
  • Start date Start date
jonroberts74
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
2^0+2^1+2^2+...+2^n=2^{n+1}-1;n \ge 0

P(0) 2^0=2^{0+1}-1 \rightarrow 1=1

P(k) = 2^{k+1}-1


1+2+2^2+2^k+2^{k+1}=2^{k+1}-1+2^{k+1}

2^{k+2}-1 = 2^{k+1}-1+2^{k+1}

= 2^{k+1}(1+1)-1

= 2^{k+1}(2)-1

= 2^{k+1+1}-1

= 2^{k+2}-1

??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution is fine, but your presentation is hard to follow. As you know, you need to prove that ##2^0=2^1-1## and then that if ##1+\cdots+2^{k}=2^{k+1}-1## then ##2^0+\cdots+2^{k+1}=2^{k+2}-1##. To prove the former, I would just write ##2^0=1=2^1-1##. The calculation that proves the latter is much easier to follow in this form:
$$2^0+\cdots+2^{k+1}=(2^0+\cdots+2^k)+2^{k+1} =(2^{k+1}-1)+2^{k+1} =2\cdot 2^{k+1}-1=2^{k+2}-1.$$ Next time use the template. The moderators may delete your post if you don't.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
You can also prove this without induction.

Proposition: ##x^n - 1 = (x - 1)(1 + x + ... + x^{n-1})##.

The above is easily shown by distributing the entire ##(1 + x + ... + x^{n-1})## on the right hand side to yield: ##(x + x^2 + ... + x^n) - (1 + x + ... + x^{n-1})##.

Now if you plug in 2 for x, you get what you were looking to prove.
 
Or, alternatively$$
s = 2^0+2^1+...+2^n$$ $$
2s=2^1+2^2+...+2^n+2^{n+1}$$Subtract the first from the second:$$
s=-2^0+2^{n+1} =2^{n+1}-1$$It's just the old geometric series trick.
 
I think what you are struggling with is a way of thinking about the algebra logic.

You assume P(k) in the induction. (Make certain to state this as an assumption.) You want to show P(k+1) holds by starting with the left-hand side and using the P(k) assumption. I'm writing ? to indicate that I stop and think, what type of relation can I make from the known information.

##2^0 + 2^1 + \cdots + 2^k + 2^{k+1} = ?## Given LHS.
##= (2^0 + 2^1 + \cdots + 2^k) + 2^{k+1} = ?## Recognize P(k)
##= (2^{k+1} -1) + 2^{k+1} = ?## Substitute P(k).
##=2(2^{k+1}) -1 = ? ## Regrouping.
##=2^{(k+1)+1} - 1## Determined RHS.

Your solution has a lot of extraneous information, so I think you are trying to "balance" an equation. You really just have to set up a series of relations.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top