How to Use Vector Analysis Identity to Solve a Closed Loop Integral?

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



we are to show a=(1/2) closed loop integral over [r x dl]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I suppose this can be done formally from the alternative form of Stokes' theorem that can be obtained by replacing the vector field in curl theorem by VxC where C is a constant vector

The identity is :

surface int [(da x grad) x V]=closed loop integral over [dl x V]

The RHS matches.But how to show that LHS leads to the required value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an identity:
\oint{\bf dr\times V}={\bf \int(\nabla V )\cdot dS<br /> - \int dS(\nabla\cdot V)}.
This can be derived by dotting the left hand side by a constatn vector, and then applying Stokes' theorem.
Applying this with V=r works.
 
Last edited:
OK,thank you.Your method worked nicely...
First I was sceptical about the grad V in your RHS...However,I started from the very beginning by dotting c with the required integral and it worked well.
 
There is an easier way I overlooked. Just take
{\vec k}\cdot\oint{\vec r}\times{\vec dr}
where k is a constant vector, and apply Stokes' theorem.
 
Last edited:
I did just that...your dr reolaced by dl...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top