How to write this function in series form?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing a function in series form, specifically f(n) = (z^n * s / 100^n) + 2*(z^(n-1) * s / 100^(n-1)) + ... with a desire to generalize it for a variable number of terms. The general j-th term is identified as s*(z^(n-j) / 100^(n-j)), and participants discuss how to sum this over a specified range of j. Clarification is sought regarding the presence of a coefficient of 2 in the second term and its implications for the overall series. Additionally, there is a query on determining how many terms are needed for the function to equal 100,000 given specific values for z and s. The conversation emphasizes the need for a concise representation of the series to avoid manually writing out numerous terms.
nickadams
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
How can I write this is series form?

f(n) = \frac{z^n * s}{100^n} + 2*\frac{z^(n-1) * s}{100^(n-1)} + \frac{z^(n-2) * s}{100^(n-2)} + \frac{z^(n-3) * s}{100^(n-3)} + \frac{z^(n-4) * s}{100^(n-4)}I stopped at this amount of terms arbitrarily, but really I want the series to stop adding terms when n is equal to x in "z^(n-x)" and "100^(n-x)". How can I say that in a general form?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
EDIT: it is supposed to be z^(n-1), 100^(n-1), z^(n-2) and 100^(n-2) etc..

not 100(n-1), 100(n-2) etc.. as it shows up in the OP
 
I don't even know if it is called series form, but I was just wondering if there was a more general way to write it? Like if n is equal to 100, I don't want to have to write out 100 terms of the equation so it would be simpler if there were a generalized form...
 
Well, the general j^th term looks like

s\frac{z^{n-j}}{100^{n-j}},

so you'll just need to sum over the range of j you want. However, in your original post you had a 2 in your second term - is that is really supposed to be there? If yes, should there be similar factors in front of the other terms? If so you will need to modify the above general term accordingly. If the term with the two is the only one like that, then summing over the above general term will leave you short a sz^{n-1}/100^{n-1}, so you'd have to add that separately.
 
Mute said:
Well, the general j^th term looks like

s\frac{z^{n-j}}{100^{n-j}},

so you'll just need to sum over the range of j you want. However, in your original post you had a 2 in your second term - is that is really supposed to be there? If yes, should there be similar factors in front of the other terms? If so you will need to modify the above general term accordingly. If the term with the two is the only one like that, then summing over the above general term will leave you short a sz^{n-1}/100^{n-1}, so you'd have to add that separately.

Thank you so much! And yes, the 2 was supposed to be there. So how can I find out how many terms it will take for my function in the OP to equal 100,000 if z=5 and s=500?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top