How Wide Is the Slit in a Single Slit Diffraction Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vsage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double slit Slit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the width of a single slit in a diffraction problem involving laser light with a wavelength of 610 nm. The distance between the first-order maxima is 3.65 mm, leading to a fringe spacing of 1.825 mm. The initial approach incorrectly applied the formula for minima instead of maxima, resulting in an erroneous calculation. The correct method involves using the formula d = λm / sin(θ), where sin(θ) can be approximated using the small angle approximation. Ultimately, the width of the slit is determined to be approximately 5.46 mm.
vsage
single slit problem (simple)

A single slit diffracts laser light of wavelength 610 nm onto a screen 3.25 m away. The distance between the two first-order maxima on either side of the central peak is 3.65 mm. How wide is the slit (in mm)?

I figured the formula \lambda m = d sin(\theta) would work but it's not. Here's my work:

sin(theta) = 3.65*0.5*10^-3 / 3.25 (since the angle is really small tan(x)~=sin(x))
sin(theta) ~= 5.62*10^-4

610*10^-9*1 = d * 5.62*10^-4

d~= 1.09mm or 1.09*10^-3m

This is wrong. What did I do wrong? Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
vsage said:
A single slit diffracts laser light of wavelength 610 nm onto a screen 3.25 m away. The distance between the two first-order maxima on either side of the central peak is 3.65 mm. How wide is the slit (in mm)?

I figured the formula \lambda m = d sin(\theta) would work but it's not.
Your formula uses the angle between the central peak and the first order MINIMA. That distance is 1/4 of 3.65mm.

AM
 


The double slit problem and single slit problem are both examples of diffraction, which is the bending of light as it passes through a small opening or around an obstacle. In the double slit problem, light passes through two small slits and produces an interference pattern on a screen, while in the single slit problem, light passes through a single slit and produces a diffraction pattern on a screen.

In the given problem, the distance between the two first-order maxima on either side of the central peak is 3.65 mm. This means that the distance between the central peak and the first-order maxima on either side is 1.825 mm. This distance is known as the fringe spacing (d) and is equal to the wavelength (λ) of the light divided by the distance between the slits (m).

Therefore, we can use the formula d = λm / sin(θ) to find the width of the slit. Rearranging this formula, we get sin(θ) = λm / d. Plugging in the values given in the problem, we get sin(θ) = (610*10^-9 m) / (1.825*10^-3 m) = 0.334. To find the width of the slit, we need to find the angle (θ) first.

We can use the small angle approximation, where sin(θ) = tan(θ) = opposite / adjacent, to find the angle (θ). In this case, the opposite side is the fringe spacing (1.825 mm) and the adjacent side is the distance between the slit and the screen (3.25 m). Therefore, tan(θ) = (1.825*10^-3 m) / (3.25 m) = 5.62*10^-7. Taking the inverse tangent of this value, we get θ = 3.23*10^-7 radians.

Now, we can plug this value for θ into the formula sin(θ) = 0.334 to find the width of the slit (d). This gives us d = 1.825 mm / 0.334 = 5.46 mm. Therefore, the width of the slit is approximately 5.46 mm.

In conclusion, the mistake made in the given solution was using the formula sin(θ) = λm instead of d = λm / sin(θ). By using the correct formula and taking
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top