Biology How would a biologist determine that a mutation has occurred when ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alliereid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mutation
AI Thread Summary
A biologist can determine if a mutation has occurred by comparing DNA from past and present samples, as mutations may not always be visibly apparent. While cancer can indicate mutations through abnormal cell growth, specific tests like imaging with radioactive substances can help identify affected areas. The human genome mapping allows researchers to trace mutations back to their effects, although the exact timing of mutations is difficult to pinpoint. Additionally, using organisms with haploid life cycles, such as yeast, can reveal mutations regardless of whether they are recessive. Overall, various methods exist to detect and analyze mutations, highlighting their complexity.
alliereid
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The effects of a mutation are not always visible. How might a biologist determine whether a mutation has occurred, and if so, what type of mutation it is?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Would it be correct to say that cancer is not always visible, so they can run test to see if the patient has cancer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i guess so, but cancer is testable, due to abnormal growth in cells, so what they do is sometimes they give you this IV that has a slightly radioactive substance in it, then they let it circulate in your system and then take an image of it. The areas that have a high concentration of it usually mean that there is abnormal growth there, which usually indicates cancer. Cancer is also indicated by an abnormal lump or growth. i.e a lump in the breast ususally is breast cancer, so a mamography, or self-examination usually id's that, and a prostate exam usually tells if the prostate has cancer. To the best of my knowledge, mutations cannot be traced back to when they occured, because it would be in the DNA, and that is multiplied many times over the same day, so it probably cannot be traced. As to what type of mutation has occured, in humans, it is usually traceable to what it does, because we have mapped the human genome. This means that they mapped the healthy version of the gene and if its mutated, then they can probably tell what it would change. Hope i helped you! =D
 
Not all mutations are cancerous.
A way to check it would be to compare DNA from past and present. If the mutation is cancerous then it hsould be testable.
The best way is to transfer the genes to something that has a haploid life cycle ie: Yest Artificial Chromosomes, and other fungi. And if there is a mutation it'll show up, recessive or not.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top