How Would a Change in Electron Spin Alter the Identity of Noble Gases?

dalarev
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that electrons had a spin number of \frac{3}{2} instead of \frac{1}{2}

That is, they have ould magnetic spin states of S_{z} = \frac{-3}{2}\hbar , \frac{-1}{2}\hbar , \frac{+1}{2}\hbar , \frac{+3}{2}\hbar

Which elements would be the "new" noble gases in this case?

Homework Equations



"real" electron spin = + 1/2, - 1/2.

Noble gases are in the group of Helium (Neon, Argon, etc.)

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured it was going to be easy because, looking at the dependence of the other 3 quantum numbers on each other, it would reveal the solution quickly. The dependence I'm referring to is n = 1, 2, 3, ...
l = 1, 2, n-1... and so on..

I can't find a dependence this clear with the spin number though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: what is so special about the nobel gases?
 
malawi_glenn said:
Hint: what is so special about the nobel gases?

l = n-1, always, for noble gases. Where does m_{s} come into play?
 
The total number of m states gives the total number of electrons which may share the same n, l states. A noble gas is an element where all of its electron shells are completely full...
 
Ben Niehoff said:
The total number of m states gives the total number of electrons which may share the same n, l states. A noble gas is an element where all of its electron shells are completely full...

... and instead of TWO electrons filling each N-L orbital, ...
 
dalarev said:
l = n-1, always, for noble gases. Where does m_{s} come into play?


How do you build up the electron stucture for helium & neon
Does a pattern reveal?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top