Humans emit very small quantities of light

  • Thread starter Thread starter octelcogopod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light quantities
AI Thread Summary
Humans emit a faint glow detectable in the invisible spectrum, but this light is 1,000 times less intense than what our eyes can perceive. While dark-adapted eyes can detect individual photons, they require multiple photons within a short timeframe to send a signal to the brain, making single-photon detection impractical for forming images. The glow is attributed to fluorescence from chemical traces on the skin, alongside minimal black body radiation. Light pollution significantly hampers the visibility of stars, as the overwhelming number of photons from artificial sources drown out the faint light from celestial bodies. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of human vision and the subtle light emissions from our bodies.
octelcogopod
Messages
560
Reaction score
0
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20090722/sc_livescience/strangehumansglowinvisiblelight

Weeird!
But awesome.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
"1,000 times less intense than the levels to which our naked eyes are sensitive"
Dark adapted eyes can detect individual photons (you don't have to be naked)
 
But if you're naked, your eyes are more likely to be dilated and you'll be better able to detect individual photons.
 
I believe this topic, more or less, appeared years ago on PF.

As a child I thought the graininess of photons in the dark was actually atoms in the air.

If we can "see" individual photons, is this factor of 1000 probabilistic?
 
Loren Booda said:
If we can "see" individual photons, is this factor of 1000 probabilistic?
I would think so: just because you can "see" individual photons, that doesn't mean you can form an image with them. Our eyes do not store/accumulate photons the way a camera does.
 
Well, I was curious how much visible light is emitted by a human simply due to black body radiation...but it's giving me a weird answer,

http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/481/bodyg.png

I would like to know how significant the difference between the black body radiation and this "other" radiation is
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The short wavelength tail of a 310K black is going to be seriously tiny.
This radiation is supposedly fluorescence from chemical traces on the skin
 
mgb_phys said:
The short wavelength tail of a 310K black is going to be seriously tiny.
This radiation is supposedly fluorescence from chemical traces on the skin

And this stuff is also described as being seriously miniscule. So I don't want to know what the relative difference is.
 
And I suppose I can't see any stars here in New Jersey because they went away?
 
  • #10
Pinu7 said:
And I suppose I can't see any stars here in New Jersey because they went away?
No it's because you can't see one photon/second from a star on top of 100,000 photons/sec from light pollution.
 
  • #11
mgb_phys said:
Dark adapted eyes can detect individual photons (you don't have to be naked)

That's not entirely accurate. Although the light-sensitive cells in the retina are capable of responding to a single photon, a neurochemical signal is not sent to the brain until several photons have been detected within the span of about 100 ms.

Cite.
 
  • #12
Just a small OT question..

Whenever I look around and focus a bit, I notice my vision is grainy and it feels like I see individual photons.. I never knew until today what this was, so those are photons I'm seeing?
If it gets dark there's always millions of small light particles that are barely visible, it never gets completely pitch black anywhere, but i can also see them in pure daylight.
 
  • #13
negitron's source also tells us that about 90 photons need to enter the eye for a flash of light to be detected, so it's impossible to actually see single photons. The graininess seen by octelcogopod is analogous to the noise in digital photos: in dark conditions, the eye boosts its sensitivity to the max, even if that means making frequent false detections.
 
  • #14
it never gets completely pitch black anywhere,
Try being in a mine with your lamp turned off.

I can't see how it could get any darker. :)
 
  • #15
Alfi said:
Try being in a mine with your lamp turned off.

I can't see how it could get any darker. :)

There are still photons, including those of visible light, being emitted from various nuclear decay products, cosmic rays, thermal jitter and neutrino activity. Of course, you need a photomultiplier tube to detect them...
 
  • #16
Pinu7 said:
And I suppose I can't see any stars here in New Jersey because they went away?
It's proof that NASA never went to NJ. The photos were staged in New Mexico which looks a lot like New Jersey if you squinch your eyes up real tight.
 
  • #17
negitron said:
There are still photons, including those of visible light, being emitted from various nuclear decay products, cosmic rays, thermal jitter and neutrino activity.
You can see thermoluminescence quite easily, unroll electrical tape or even tread heavily on some types of sand and you get a surprising amount of light.
 
Back
Top