HUP and good quantum numbers that commute

Salman2
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the HUP. As I understand the HUP, it only applies to conjugate attributes that do not commute, such as position and momentum. However, many good quantum numbers do commute, so does this mean that the HUP does not apply to simultaneous measurement of such good quantum numbers ?

Also, for the hydrogen atom, is it not true that the total energy Hamiltonian, and angular momentum commute, thus the HUP would not apply to their simultaneous measurement ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The set of good quantum numbers uniquely designate a particular quantum state. Therefore, you have to be able to know them simultaneously. By the way, quantum numbers themselves do not "commute", it is the operators relate to them that do (or do not...).

So yes, you can simulatneously know the total energy of the hydrogen atom and its total angular momentum. But that does not mean that you can also know individual angular momenta, such as electronic orbital angular momentum. That will depend on what terms you actually consider in the Hamiltonian (spin-orbit coupling, hyperfine interaction, ...)
 
DrClaude said:
The set of good quantum numbers uniquely designate a particular quantum state. Therefore, you have to be able to know them simultaneously. ..So yes, you can simultaneously know the total energy of the hydrogen atom and its total angular momentum.
Thanks.

I would like to follow-up your reply to a question about the double slit experiment. At the moment in time a quantum state enters the 3D volume of each slit, would it be correct to say that we can 'know' simultaneously all good quantum numbers for the state at each 3D slit space ? If yes, can we then know the combined set of good quantum numbers at both slits, simultaneously ?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top