HW Lab PHYS101: Net torque of pulley system and meterstick position balance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating net torque in a pulley system and balancing a meter stick with a fulcrum. The participants analyze the torque generated by various weights and their distances from the fulcrum, specifically using the equations Torque net = radius x force and LA1 = LA2. A key conclusion is that to balance a 0.1 kg meter stick with a 200 g mass at the 0 cm mark, another 200 g mass must be positioned at the 90 cm mark. Additionally, the net torque calculations yield a net force of 15 Joules counterclockwise.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque calculations in physics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of clockwise and counterclockwise forces
  • Knowledge of lever arms and their impact on balance
  • Basic principles of pulley systems and force vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque and equilibrium in physics
  • Learn how to apply the lever arm equation in various scenarios
  • Explore advanced pulley system mechanics and their applications
  • Investigate the effects of mass distribution on balance in physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of torque and balance in physical systems.

pmalayavech
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
THANKS, I ONLY NEED HELP #2 NOW, PLEASE
10/31/12 @ 9:10 pm
bump

Homework Statement


1)If the fulcrum of a 0.1 kg meter stick was placed at the 40 cm mark and a 200 g mass at the 0 cm mark, would it be possible to balance the meter stick with a 200 g mass on the long side of the meter stick? What would the position of the mass have to be to balance the meter stick?

2) What is the torque acting on the pulley system below

10-31-2012040104PM.jpg


Homework Equations



LA1=LA2

Torque net= radius x force

The Attempt at a Solution



FROM DIAGRAM
#2, this is my first time working on this type of problem. how should I combine the other "counterclockwise" 2 pulleys? value correct? 10N x radius #2 of 1m= 10Nm

and the other T1=15N x radius#1 of 2m= 30Nm??

How do i combine these 2 forces? Are they negative?I understand 60Nm is correct from the clockwise but not the other. Please help!

Please help -- Greatly Needed
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi pmalayavech! welcome to pf! :smile:
pmalayavech said:
I found the sum of the forces for each body (the pulley and the hanging weight (Newton)) but I don't know how to do the equation, it is a vector so it should be negative one end and positve on the other.

yes, technically torque is a vector

but in a 2D case like this, all you need to say is "clockwise" or "anti-clockwise" :wink:

(I'm not clear … are you asking about question 1) also? :confused:)
 


tiny-tim said:
hi pmalayavech! welcome to pf! :smile:


yes, technically torque is a vector

but in a 2D case like this, all you need to say is "clockwise" or "anti-clockwise" :wink:

(I'm not clear … are you asking about question 1) also? :confused:)


Tim!, hey thanks


that is correct, so it would be

(20N)(2m)+(15N)(1M)cc=(30N)(2m)cw


(45Joules)cc = (60Joules)cw

there for the net force is a Fnet of 15 Joules counterclockwise

YES, i need help on the first one as well, any idea, please.
 
hey pmalayavech! :smile:
pmalayavech said:
Tim!, hey thanks

that is correct, so it would be

(20N)(2m)+(15N)(1M)cc=(30N)(2m)cw

i] are we using the same diagram? :confused:

ii] this shouldn't be an equation! :rolleyes:

you should simply be adding the torques (some positive, some negative)!
YES, i need help on the first one as well, any idea, please.

what have you done so far? :smile:
 
i) yes, same diagram

ii) ok, no equations, I was thinking about conservation, where net force will equal to zero.

ok, cc is negative and cw is positive? -40Nm-15Nm+60Nm= 15Nm

from the pulley, I am looking at the left side as negatives and the right side positives. I hope I had multiplied the radius to the right "T"
 
pmalayavech said:
ok, cc is negative and cw is positive? -40Nm-15Nm+60Nm= 15Nm

+60 is right, but i don't see how you got the other two :confused:
 
Alright, for #1

for Larm 1
I did r(1)=0-40
=-40cm
Tcc= -40 x 200
=-800 gcm for m1La2

now for m2LA2
i am stuck
 
let's see …
pmalayavech said:
1)If the fulcrum of a 0.1 kg meter stick was placed at the 40 cm mark and a 200 g mass at the 0 cm mark, would it be possible to balance the meter stick with a 200 g mass on the long side of the meter stick? What would the position of the mass have to be to balance the meter stick?
pmalayavech said:
Alright, for #1

for Larm 1
I did r(1)=0-40
=-40cm
Tcc= -40 x 200
=-800 gcm for m1La2

now for m2LA2
i am stuck

ok, now you need the torque for the 500g stick, at the 50 cm mark, and for the other 200g mass, at x cm :wink:
 
#1,

for Tcc= -8000gcm

the fact that fulcrum only moved to the left 10cm (at 40cm), where it ought to be balance at 50cm (center), if we had 2 equal weights on both side, it would balance "cc" at 0cm and "cw" at 100cm, agree?

so, since fulcrum moved to the left 10cm(40cm), weight at 0cm, on the "cw" side, the weight of that should moved 10cm to the left as well to balance. so the "cw" 200g mass should be at 90cm!

yes agree?

also for #2, this is my first time working on this type of problem. how should I combine the other 2 pulleys? value correct? 10N x radius #2 of 1m= 10Nm

and the other T1=15N x radius#1 of 2m= 60Nm??

do i have atleast these values correct?

Thanks again
 
  • #10
need help with the second one. please
 
  • #11
Just the last one

for #2, this is my first time working on this type of problem. how should I combine the other 2 pulleys? value correct? 10N x radius #2 of 1m= 10Nm

and the other T1=15N x radius#1 of 2m= 60Nm??

do i have atleast these values correct?
 
  • #12
still trying, and no references to check answers with
 
  • #13
hi pmalayavech! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)
pmalayavech said:
the fact that fulcrum only moved to the left 10cm (at 40cm), where it ought to be balance at 50cm (center), if we had 2 equal weights on both side, it would balance "cc" at 0cm and "cw" at 100cm, agree?

yes :smile:
so, since fulcrum moved to the left 10cm(40cm), weight at 0cm, on the "cw" side, the weight of that should moved 10cm to the left as well to balance. so the "cw" 200g mass should be at 90cm!

no

i] it would have to be 20 cm, wouldn't it?

ii] anyway, you're not taking the weight of the ruler itself into account :redface:

write the equation out properly, or you'll never learn how to do these problems​
10N x radius #2 of 1m= 10Nm

and the other T1=15N x radius#1 of 2m= 60Nm??

do i have atleast these values correct?

yes, that's correct now! :smile:
 
  • #14
Thank you, I understand now. after working out the problem, it was common sense to have to have it at 20cm, to evenly distribute the weight.
8000cc=8000cw, duhh

And yes the "net" force is adding it all up i presume
130 Joules

I was able to turn this in complete now, even though late, its fine. I understand thanks
Timmy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
22K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K