Hydro static forces on curved surfaces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of hydrostatic forces on curved surfaces, specifically addressing the term 'missing water' in a solution diagram. It clarifies that, according to Pascal's Law, the hydrostatic pressure on the wetted portion of the arc AB is equivalent to the pressure from a column of liquid at the same depth. The 'missing water' refers to a hypothetical scenario where filling the indicated region with water would equalize the pressure inside and outside the arc AB, resulting in no net pressure acting on it. This understanding is crucial for accurately analyzing hydrostatic forces in fluid mechanics. The explanation emphasizes the importance of considering pressure equilibrium in such problems.
princejan7
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://postimg.org/image/4fhu5k9r9/

Can someone explain what is meant by 'missing water' in this solution diagram
The original question diagram had no such water above the gate AB

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
princejan7 said:

Homework Statement


http://postimg.org/image/4fhu5k9r9/

Can someone explain what is meant by 'missing water' in this solution diagram
The original question diagram had no such water above the gate AB

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


By Pascal's Law, the hydrostatic pressure on the wetted portion of the arc AB at a given depth h from the free surface of the liquid is the same as the pressure exerted by a column of liquid of depth h placed on the outside of the arc.

If the region indicated by 'missing water' on the diagram was filled with water, there would be no net pressure acting on the arc AB, i.e., the pressure outside the arc would be the same as the pressure inside the tank.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top