Hydrogen and hydroxide concentration

AI Thread Summary
At 25°C, the ion product of water (KW) is maintained at 1 x 10^-14, regardless of changes in hydrogen ion concentration. When hydrogen ions are introduced, they can form hydroxonium ions or interact with hydroxyl ions, affecting their concentrations. The balance between hydrogen and hydroxyl ions is governed by chemical equilibria, where the reaction quotient equals the equilibrium constant. This phenomenon aligns with Le Chatelier's principle, which describes how systems respond to changes to maintain equilibrium. Understanding these principles clarifies why hydroxyl ion concentration adjusts to keep KW constant.
nobahar
Messages
482
Reaction score
2
This may not even be a valid question, as I may have misunderstood; but here goes...
At 25C, the KW of water is 1 x 10-14 If you increase the amount of hydogen ions present, why does the concentration of hydroxyl ions present alter in such a way that the KW is maintained (i.e. the product of the concentrations of hydrogen and hydroxyl ions)?
If you introduce protons, then they may associate with water to form hydroxonium ions, or they may associate with hydroxyl ions; in the first there will be an incraese in the hydrogen ion concentration, in the second there will be more water formed, which decreases the hydroxyl concentration but does not alter the hydrogen ion concentration. If it was a mixture of the two (that is, if the protons introduced interact with water both water and hroxyl ions), I still can't see how the two concentrations would be balanced so that the KW is maintained.
No textbooks seem to give a reason, which suggests I've misunderstood. Can someone help me with this? :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nobahar said:
why does the concentration of hydroxyl ions present alter in such a way that the KW is maintained

Because that's exactly the way it works?

All chemical equilibria have the same property - at equilbrium reaction quotient equals equilbrium constant. It can be explained in thermodynamical terms (using chemical potentials), it can be explained in kinetic terms (using speeds of forward and backward reactions) - but in fact both explanations just follow the observed reality.

Reality was first, explanations are later :smile:

--
 
Am I right in saying that this ties in with Le Chatelier's principle, then?
 
Yes, just remember that Le Chatelier's principle also describes reality as it was observed.

--
 
Thankyou Borek.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top