Hydrogen and Oxygen from Electricity and Water

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Unitized Regenerative Fuel Cell developed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, which can produce electricity from hydrogen and oxygen and also generate these gases from electricity and water. This dual-mode functionality allows for efficient energy storage and conversion, although it requires occasional recharging. Participants emphasize the scientific validity of the technology while addressing misconceptions about its efficiency and potential for perpetual motion. The conversation highlights the challenges posed by traditional energy companies in adopting such innovative technologies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fuel cell technology and its applications
  • Knowledge of electrochemical processes, particularly in PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) systems
  • Familiarity with energy storage concepts, specifically regenerative systems
  • Awareness of the implications of energy independence from traditional fossil fuels
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cells
  • Explore advancements in regenerative fuel cell technology
  • Investigate the energy-to-weight ratio of various energy storage systems
  • Examine the impact of energy companies on renewable technology adoption
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and energy policy makers interested in innovative energy solutions, fuel cell technology, and the transition to sustainable energy sources will benefit from this discussion.

Silvershadow
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I came across an amazing fuel cell created by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. It's actually called a http://www.llnl.gov/IPandC/technology/profile/transportation/UnitizedRegenerativeFuelCell/index.php which has a duel mode. Not only can it produce electricity from oxygen and hydrogen (two very abundant and easily available molecules) which is amazing in itself, but it is also reversible so can produce hydrogen and oxygen from electricity and water. Cool huh.
They've also developed the MOST POWERFUL SOLID STATE LAZER which is the stuff of bond movies. They've already developed a proto that after a 6-second shot of laser light produced a 1-centimeter hole in a 2-centimeter-thick slice of steel. If I were a bond villain this company would definitely be on my books!

Silvershadow
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This belongs in a Bond film. Or maybe Austin Powers, because it's a bunch of goofy crap. You can't get more electricity out of burning hydrogen and oxygen than it takes to make it from water.

But you probably already knew that.
 
I don't think he's suggesting it's a perpetual motion machine, only that it's (nearly) reversible.

- Warren
 
The concept is real. The science is real. The cell must be rejuvenated on occasion ( by recharging water /electricity) as no system can be 100% efficient or fight the 2nd law.

I have trod this path on 3 different forums and have gotten the "woo-woo" response at the start of thread and pregnant silence at the end. Do the research first , then scoff.

The leading opponents are the large energy ( oil/electric ) company's to whom a regenerative fuel cell represents a departure from the daily dependence on their product. The are trying ( with concerted effort , such as the availability of research dollars to "directed projects)to preempt efforts of a self renewing resource by trying to direct the field to adopt fuel cell technologies that rely on using hydrogen as a "fuel" rather then a occasional replenished catalyst.

Research befor you opine..
 
So what does this do that's different from a normal fuel cell?

- Warren
 
Originally posted by chroot
So what does this do that's different from a normal fuel cell?

- Warren

Doesn't really say much on the given link, but it looks like they've licked two different transport problems with a single electrode-electrolyte configuration --- not trivial.
 
Yeah, it's a PEM that can be run in reverse. Essentially, it's a "water battery." Pretty nifty, particularly if what they claim about the energy-to-weight ratio is true.

I don't think anyone is woo-wooing your link, TillEulenspiegel. I think Chemicalsuperfreak mistakenly thought you were suggesting it was a "perpetual energy source," though I can't speak for him.

- Warren
 
Having read the postings and given link, this device does exactly what it says. It combines two related technologies into one package, reducing the overall weight of a system that would otherwise require both and, collectively, heavier separate units.
No perpetual anything. Just an engineering systems-intergration affording weight reduction; useful in special applications noted in the article.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K