Hydrogen compounds and states of matter

AI Thread Summary
The chemical properties of hydrogen compounds vary significantly with their state of matter—solid, liquid, or gas. Key factors influencing these differences include the dissociation of H+ and OH- ions in solution, the energy needed to break covalent bonds in solids, and the cohesion of liquid solvents in aqueous solutions. The discussion suggests that phase behavior relates to the compound's colligative properties. The consensus leans towards option D, indicating that hydrogen bonding is not a primary factor in this context. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for studying hydrogen compounds across different states of matter.
n108
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Chemical properties of hydrogen compounds can have vast differences depending on the state of matter that the substance is in - solid, liquid or gas. The difference in chemical properties is related to

the dissociation of H+ from the hydrogen compound into solution.

the dissociation of OH- from the hydrogen compound into solution.

the energy threshold required to break the covalent bonds in the solid.

the slight cohesion of the liquid solvent forming the aqueous solution.

I think the answer is D - it has nothing to do with hydrogen bonding...but I am not sure at all.
HELP! PLEASE!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Phase behavior" is a function of the compound's "colligative properties;" so, yes, "D."
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top